Chennai Madurai Court February 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
P. Jeyaraman Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Trichy and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 3rd respondent to register an FIR on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 22.12.2015 made before the 1st respondent.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent to register an FIR on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 22.12.2015 made before the 1st respondent. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 22.12.2015, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed. A copy of the Closure Report has been furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law....
P. Kethcial Annamariyal Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin an ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent police to register a case on the complaint of the petitioner dated 15.07.2015.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent police to register a case on the complaint of the petitioner dated 15.07.2015. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 15.07.2015, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed. 3. Recording the same, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to workout her remedy in the manner known to law. The respondent police is directed to serve a copy of the Closure Report on the petitioner within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order....
M. Chinnasamy and Another Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Karur and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent No.2 to register FIR on the basis of the complaint preferred by the petitioner dated 13.1.2016 and take necessary action in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent No.2 to register FIR on the basis of the complaint preferred by the petitioner dated 13.1.2016 and take necessary action in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 13.01.2016 has been sent by post to the 2nd respondent. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 13.01.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance w...
Lakshmi Prabha Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar and Anot ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 1st Respondent to direct the 2nd Respondent to register the case based on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 20.01.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 1st Respondent to direct the 2nd Respondent to register the case based on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 20.01.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 20.01.2016 has been sent by post to the 1st respondent. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 20.01.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with law, if it discloses the commission of a cogniza...
T. Meenakshi Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar and Anothe ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register the case on basis of the complaint given by the petitioner dated 9.2.2016 and investigate the case in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register the case on basis of the complaint given by the petitioner dated 9.2.2016 and investigate the case in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 09.02.2016 has been sent by post to the 1st respondent. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 09.02.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with law, if ...
Diraviam and Others Vs. State through The Sub-Inspector of Police, Din ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer:Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records in P.R.C.No.5 of 2015 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Nathem and quash the same.) 1. This petition has been filed to quash the P.R.C.No.5 of 2015 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Nathem. 2. As this Court is not inclined to quash the proceedings in P.R.C.No.5 of 2015 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Nathem, on the basis of the compromise entered into between the parties in view of the serious allegations levelled against these petitioners/ accused, learned counsel for the petitioners/accused seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and she has also made an endorsement to that effect. 3. Permission is granted. This Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn....
R. Prakashkumar and Others Vs. The Deputy Superintedent of Police, Sam ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying to direct the Learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge (PCR Court), Madurai to accept the surrender of the petitioners and consider the bail applications of the petitioners on the same day on merits in connection with Crime No. 80 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police.) 1. This petition has been filed, seeking to direct the Learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge (PCR Court), Madurai to accept the surrender of the petitioners and consider the bail applications of the petitioners on the same day on merits in connection with Crime No. 80 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner has been implicated in this case for the alleged offences under Sections 147, 294B, 323, 448, 354 IPC r/w 3(1)(x) of SC/ST Act in Crime No.80 of 2016 and that in view of the specific bar under Section 18 of the said...
Petchiammal Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Theni and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register FIR against the proposed accused on the basis of the petitioners complaint dated 29.1.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register FIR against the proposed accused on the basis of the petitioners complaint dated 29.1.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 29.01.2016 has been sent by post to the 1st respondent. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 29.01.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with law, if it discloses the commission of a cognizable offence or drop ac...
A. Arul Mozhi Vs. The Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent herein to register a case on the basis of the petitioner's fresh complaint dated 13.02.2016 and proceed with investigation in accordance with law and thus render justice.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent herein to register a case on the basis of the petitioner's fresh complaint dated 13.02.2016 and proceed with investigation in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. On reading of the complaint dated 13.02.2016, it is seen that this petitioner and the opposite party are having disputes in connection with a path way and a suit in O.S.No.516 of 2015 is pending. While so, it is alleged by the petitioner that on 11.01.2016, when she came to take photographs, the opposite party had threatened the petitioner on dire consequences. 4. A reading of the complaint do...
S. Pushpalatha Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to give adequate police protection to the petitioner and her husband for their life and limb considering the representation of the petitioner dated 18.02.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to give adequate police protection to the petitioner and her husband for their life and limb considering the representation of the petitioner dated 18.02.2016. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. It is seen that this petitioner fell in love with one Ramachandra Prabhu, who belongs to a different community and got married on 31.01.2016 at Sri Ayyanar Temple, Vedasandur and it is alleged that the petitioner's uncle / 3rd respondent herein is causing disturbance to their life. 4. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh vs State of U.P. and Another, reported...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »