Chennai Madurai Court February 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Lakshmanan Vs. State represented by The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the Judgment dated 11.11.2013 passed in Sessions Case No.164 of 2010 by the First Additional District and Sessions Court, Madurai.) A. Selvam, J. 1. The convictions and sentences dated 11.11.2013 passed in Sessions Case No.164 of 2010 by the First Additional District and Sessions Court, Madurai are being challenged in the present Criminal Appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the parents of the de facto complainant prior to twenty years have purchased a house plot from one Kaliappan in Jawahar Nagar, Tirumangalam. In the said plot, they constructed a building in a small portion. The remaining portion has been used as its appurtenance. The accused has encroached a portion of vacant place and thereby deterred sewage water and due to that a problem has arisen between de facto complainant and accused. Further another problem has been existence between the de facto complainant an...
Tvl. Kanishga Maligai Vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT), Tric ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records in S.P. No.20/2016 in VAT AP.No.356/2015 dated 22.01.2016 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same as illegal and direct the 2nd respondent to accept the personal bond to be executed by the petitioner in lieu of security.) 1. Aggrieved against the conditions imposed by the appellate authority, while granting stay, the petitioner firm is before this Court. 2. Mr.R.Karthikeyan, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. 3. By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 4. It is the case of the petitioner that as per the direction of the second respondent the petitioner firm has already paid Rs.23,426/- towards the disputed tax. For the balance amount, the appellate authority directed the petitioner firm to file a Security Bond or Bank Guarantee. However, the petitioner firm is not ...
J. Sabirana Shyamala and Others Vs. The State Rep. by The Superintende ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent No. 2 to register the case based upon the petition presented by the petitioner to the respondent No.1 dated 26.12.2015 and to pass such other further orders as this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent No. 2 to register the case based upon the petition presented by the petitioner to the respondent No.1 dated 26.12.2015 and to pass such other further orders as this Honourable Court. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 26.12.2015 has been sent by post to the 1st respondent. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 26.12.2015. On receipt of such complaint,...
K. Muthaiya Servai and Another Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Raman ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the Respondent No.1 to file the final report in Crime No. 95 of 2014 on the file of the Respondent No.2 within a stipulated time that may be fixed by this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filedto direct the Respondent No.1 to file the final report in Crime No. 95 of 2014 on the file of the Respondent No.2 within a stipulated time. 2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that if some more time is granted by this Court, the investigation would be completed and final report would be filed by the respondent before the concerned Court. The said statement is recorded. 3. In view of the above, the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent police to complete the investigation and to file final report before the concerned jurisdictional Court as expeditiously as possible....
Gurunathan Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 1st respondent to transfer the investigation in Crime No.403 of 2015 on the file of the 2nd respondent to any other competent authority under the supervision of the 1st respondent.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to transfer the investigation in Crime No.403 of 2015 on the file of the 2nd respondent to any other competent authority under the supervision of the 1st respondent. 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that the investigation in Crime No.403 of 2015 has been completed and a final report has also been filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aranthangi on 12.11.2015 and the same has not yet been taken on file. 3. In view of the above submission, this Court is of the view that no positive direction can be issued to the 1st respondent to transfer the case in Crime No.403 of 2015 to some other agency...
Tmt. Baby Selvi Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register the case based on the complaint given by the petitioner herein dated 06.02.2016 and investigate the same in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register the case based on the complaint given by the petitioner herein dated 06.02.2016 and investigate the same in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 06.02.2016 has been sent by post to the respondents. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 06.02.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with...
Lakshmanan Vs. State represented by The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the Judgment dated 11.11.2013 passed in Sessions Case No.164 of 2010 by the First Additional District and Sessions Court, Madurai.) A. Selvam, J. 1. The convictions and sentences dated 11.11.2013 passed in Sessions Case No.164 of 2010 by the First Additional District and Sessions Court, Madurai are being challenged in the present Criminal Appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the parents of the de facto complainant prior to twenty years have purchased a house plot from one Kaliappan in Jawahar Nagar, Tirumangalam. In the said plot, they constructed a building in a small portion. The remaining portion has been used as its appurtenance. The accused has encroached a portion of vacant place and thereby deterred sewage water and due to that a problem has arisen between de facto complainant and accused. Further another problem has been existence between the de facto complainant an...
S. Muthaiah and Others Vs. State Represented by The Inspector of Polic ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for records in Crime No.573 of 2015 on the file of the Anti-Land, Grab Cell, Madurai District, Madurai and quash the same insofar as the petitioners are concerned.) 1. This petition has been filed seeking to quash the case registered in Crime No.573 of 2015 on the file of the Anti-Land, Grab Cell, Madurai District, Madurai, pursuant to the amicable settlement effected between the parties. 2. It is seen that a case in Crime No.573 of 2015 for the alleged offences under Sections 468, 471 and 420 IPC, has been registered against the petitioners / A1 to A3. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioners/Accused and the third respondent, appeared in persons and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of the identity of the parties by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) through the respondent Police, namely, P.Ram Narayanan, Inspector of Police, ...
M. Jeyakarthikeyan Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Police,Madurai
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 1st respondent to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case based on the complaint dated 22.01.2016 preferred by the petitioner and to file a final report.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case based on the complaint dated 22.01.2016 preferred by the petitioner and to file a final report. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 22.01.2016, given by the petitioner, an enquiry is being conducted by the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Thilagar Thidal, Madurai City. 3. In view of the above submission, the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Thilagar Thidal, Madurai City is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this ord...
M. Vadivel Vs. State through The Superintendent of Police Dindigul and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Feb-23-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 1st respondent to direct the 2nd respondent to register the case on the petitioner's complaint dated 28.12.2015 in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to direct the 2nd respondent to register the case on the petitioner's complaint dated 28.12.2015 in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that the complaint dated 28.12.2015, given by the petitioner, has been transferred to the file of the Inspector of Police, Vedasandur Police Station, Dindigul District. 3. Hence, the petitioner is directed to go in person before the Inspector of Police, Vedasandur Police Station, Dindigul District and lodge a fresh complaint containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 28.12.2015. On receipt of such complaint, the s...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »