Andhra Pradesh Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Syed Zakir Hussa Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-02-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR W.P.NO.27970 OF2012dated:02-07-2013 Syed Zakir Hussain..Petitioner The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented By its Secretary, Revenue Department (Stamps and Registration).Secretariat, Hyderabad, and others....Respondents Counsel for appellants : Sr.Srinivas Rao Beemaruthi Counsel for respondents: Sr.G.P.for Revenue HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED: 1.W.P.No.14099 of 2003 & batch, dt. 07.12.2005 WRIT PETITION NO.27970 OF2012ORDER By way of this writ petition, the petitioner challenged G.O.Ms.No.237 (wrongly mentioned as G.O.Ms.No.240).Revenue (Registration-I).dated 05.03.2004, and the refusal by the Sub-Registrar, Ibrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy District, the second respondent, relying thereon, to register the documents presented by him in respect of the agricultural land admeasuring Ac.4-34 guntas in Sy.No.96, Mangalpalli Village, Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. It is the case of the petitioner that he is the absolute owner and possessor of the...
Thota Uday Kiran Kumar Vs. the Branch Manager, National Insurance Comp ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
Oral Order: (M. Shreesha, Member) 1) Aggrieved by the order in CC No. 131/2012 on the file of the Dist. Forum, Guntur the complainant preferred this appeal and along with it the above application to condone delay of 161 days in preferring the appeal on the ground that copy of the order was despatched on 11.2.2013 and the same was received by him on 19.2.2013 through his counsel and as he is working for a Mobile Phone company as Marketing Executive he could not contact his counsel and when he approached his counsel he advised him to prefer an appeal as he has got a good case and fair chances of winning the matter and in the process a delay of 161 days had occasioned. The petitioner submits that the delay in filing the appeal is neither wanton nor wilful and therefore prayed that the delay be condoned. 2) In the light of the fact that delay was whopping 161 days without any material whatsoever to substantiate the delay, we do not wish to order any notice to the respondent as no improveme...
M/S. Srija Constructions Rep. by Its Managing Partner Vs. T. Srinivas ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The opposite party is the appellant. The respondents filed complaint claiming an amount of Rs.4,10,000/- towards loss of rent and a sum of Rs.10,24,000/- as compensation for delay caused in construction of the building as also a sum of Rs.20,000/- towards compensation for suffering mental tension. 2. The case of the respondents as seen from the complaint is that the respondent no.1 is the owner of house bearing number 1-68 in Plot No.38 admeasuring 280 sq.yards and the respondent no.2 is the owner of house bearing number 1-67 in plot number 37 situate at Kothapet village of Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy district . Smt.Vimala Devi is the owner of plot bearing number 36 adjacent to the plots of the respondents. The respondents and Vimala Devi entered into Development Agreement with the appellant for development of land and construction of building thereon within 18 months from the date of development agreement. In case of delay caused in...
The State OfA.P., Rep. by the Public Pr Vs. 1) Palika Raju @ Raviraju ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE K.C.BHANU AND HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM CRIMINAL APPEAL No.607 OF2013dated:1st July, 2013 The State of A.P., rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High court of A.P., Hyderabad...Appellant-Petitioner 1) Palika Raju @ Ravi Raju @ Telu Raju, S/o Venkata Ramana, C/Settibalija, 35 yeaRs.Supplier in Subbarayya Hotel, R/o D.No.10-2-59, Pamuvari Street, Ramaraopeta of Kakinada. 2) Puppala Sireesh Kumar @ Suresh @ Sireesh, S/o Venkata Ramana, 23 YeaRs.C/Kapu, Taxi Driver, D.No.10-3-26, Near Johns Luthern Church, Meduri Vari Street, Ramaraopeta of Kakinada, East Godavari Dist...Respondents Counsel for the appellant: Learned Additional Public Prosecutor Counsel for the respondent No.1: -- Counsel for the respondent No.2: Sr.V.V.S.S.Kameswara Rao : ?.Cases referred: 1. (1993) 1 SCC12. (2004) 12 SCC244HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE K.C.BHANU AND HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM CRIMINAL APPEAL No.607 OF2013JUDGMENT:- (per Hon'ble Sr.Justice Challa Kodanda Ram) This Criminal Appeal...
M/S.Shankar Daswani and Oth Vs. Government of Ap, Rep. by Its Principa ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO W.P.Nos.7892 of 2009 and batch dated:01-07-2013 M/s.Shankar Daswani and others...Petitioner Government of AP, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, YAT & C (S) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others....Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri R.V.Reddy, Sri C.V.Bhaskar Reddy, Sri Md.Ahmed Quadri and Sri P.R.Prasad. Counsel for the 1st respondent : Sri V.C.H.Naidu Counsel for the 2nd respondent : Sri M.V.S.Prasad HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred 1 (2010) 1 SCC7162 AIR1977SC14963 AIR1989SC10764 (2000) 6 SCC2935 (2003) 7 SCC4106 (1996) 6 SCC22THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO W.P.Nos.7892, 7998 and 8566 of 2009; and W.P.Nos.22246, 22559, 31162, 31163 and 32924 of 2010 COMMON ORDER : As a common question arises for consideration in these cases, they are being disposed of by a common order. The facts in WP.No.7892 of 2009, being illustrative of the facts in all these cases, the same are referred to.2. The petitioner in W.P.7892 of ...
1.Suresh Kumar JaIn S/O Late Ghambdilal Vs. 1.State of A.P., Rep. by t ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.13533 of 2010 dated:01-07-2013 1.Suresh Kumar Jain S/o Late Ghambdilal Jain, Aged 41 years, Occ: Business, R/o 5-456, Tilak Nagar, 2nd Cross, Shimoga Dist., Karnataka.... Petitioner 1.State of A.P., rep. by the Public Prosecutor,High Court of A.P., High Court Building,Hyderabad and another ... Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Mahesh Raje, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent No.1:Public Prosecutor Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Sri Govardhan Venu, Advocate : ?.Cases referred:1. 2009 (4) JCC30212. (2012) 10 SCC7413. I (2013) CCR150(SC) THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.13533 of 2010 ORDER:1. This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner/accused No.4, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ".Cr.P.C.".) seeking quashing of the proceedings in C.C.No.200 of 2007 on the file of XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, which were ini...
1.Sri Sanjeev Malhotra S/O Sri Sudarshan Vs. 1.M/S Sunshine Fruit Pulp ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.4443 of 2010 dated:01-07-2013 1.Sri Sanjeev Malhotra S/o Sri Sudarshan Kumar Malhotra, Managing Director,M/s Sudarshan Overseas Limited,Admn.Shivaji Marg, New Delhi-15 and another. ... Petitioners 1.M/s Sunshine Fruit Pulp Industries,A Regd. Partnership Firm, rep. by its Managing Partner Sri M.Murali Reddy,Having its Regd. Office at 1-164, Main Road,Sathupalli, Khammam District, Andhra Pradesh.... Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners:Sri Nandigam Krishna Rao, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondents: Public Prosecutor : ?.Cases referred:1. (2012) 1 SCC520THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.4443 of 2010 ORDER:1. This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners, who are accused Nos.2 and 4, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ".Cr.P.C.".) seeking quashing of the proceedings in C.C.No.198 of 2009 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate, Sathupalli, Kham...
Bandaru Mutyalu and Anoth Vs. Palli Appalar
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5525 of 2011 01-07-2013 Bandaru Mutyalu and another....PETITIONERS Palli Appalaraju...RESPONDENT Counsel for the petitioners: Sri K.Subrahmanyam Counsel for the respondent: Sri P.Veera Reddy. HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred:1. 2006 ALD6752 2001(4) CCC416(Bom) 3 AIR1986Madras 33 4 AIR1988Orissa 248 5 AIR1959AP170= 1958 ALT7926 1988 (1) ALT353THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO C.R.P.No.5525 of 2011 ORDER This revision petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dt.18-08-2011 in I.A.No.173 of 2008 in O.S.No.448 of 2004 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judges Court, Srikakulam.2. The petitioners are defendants in the suit. The suit was filed by the respondent for permanent injunction restraining the petitioners from interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the 'ABCD' marked front yard vacant site.3. Pending suit, I.A.No.173 of 2008 was filed by t...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›