Andhra Pradesh Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited R Vs. 1. Polisetti Satyavathi, ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-12-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO C.M.A.No.1544 of 2004 dated:12-07-2013. The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Rep. by its Divisional Manager,Divisional Office, Tanuku...APPELLANT1 Polisetti Satyavathi, W/o Atchuta Rama Gopala Rao,Hindu, 38 yrs., House- wife, 15th ward, Royal Talkies, Tanuku, West Godavari District and others..RESPONDENTS Counsel for the appellant:Sri.R.Briz Mohan Singh ^Counsel for the respondent Nos.1 to 4 : SRI.I.Gopal Reddy Counsel for the respondent Nos.5, 7 & 8 : None : ?.CITATIONS:1. 1978 Volume 2 ALT page 171 2) 1988 (1) APLJ1073) 1990(3) ALT628(D.B.) 4) 2002(6) ALD4155) 2012 ACJ191THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO C.M.A.No.1544 of 2004 JUDGMENT : This appeal is filed by the Oriental Insurance Company Limited challenging the award passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (District Judge) West Godavari, Eluru in O.P.No.430 of 2000.2. The principal ground of challenge in the grounds set out in appeal is that, the Claims Tribunal has granted exces...
Pulipati Venugopal Rao Vs. the Branch Manager, Abhinav (Aditya Motors ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-11-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The complainant is the appellant. He filed complaint claiming for replacement of Hero Honda Motor Cycle or in the alternative for repayment of the cost of the vehicle, Rs.53,698/- with interest @24% p.a. and an amount of Rs.5,000/- towards compensation and costs. 2. The appellant purchased Hero Honda Motor Cycle on 24.12.2010 from the 1st respondent for consideration of Rs.53,698/- and the 2nd respondent issued delivery challan on 27.12.2010 and the vehicle was registered with registration number AP 07 AZ 7550 and was furnished with warranty for a period of 2 years or 30000 kms whichever is earlier from the date of its purchase. 3. The case of the appellant is that vehicle posed frequent repairs due to manufacturing defect. The 4th respondent, the manufacturer of the vehicle issued Brochure and Users Manual. The 1st respondent represented that the fuel consumption of the vehicle is 65 kms per litre and it is actually 39 kms per liter. The...
Shaik Jilani Saheb,s/O Moulali Saheb Vs. the Govt of A.P., Reptd., by ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-11-2013
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.20151 of 2013 Date:11-07-2013 Shaik Jilani Saheb,S/o Moulali Saheb....Petitioner The Govt of A.P., reptd., by the Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise Department, Hyderabad and four others.....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.D.Kasim Saheb Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3: AGP for Prohibition and Excise Counsel for Respondent No.4: AGP for Revenue Counsel for Respondent No.5: AGP for Home : ?.CITATIONS: NIL The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in permitting establishment of a retail A-4 liquor shop without reference to the existence of a mosque within the prohibited distance of 100 meters as illegal and arbitrary. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise, on instructions, submitted that the purported mosque is not a registered one and that, therefore, the prohibition contained in Rule-25 of th...
M/S Sri Venkateswara Gas Agency,sirvel V Vs. the Govt of A.P., Reptd b ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-11-2013
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.20088 of 2013 dated: 11-07-2013 M/s Sr.Venkateswara Gas Agency,Sirvel Village and Mandal,Reptd by its Proprietor-S.Krishna Moorthy...Petitioner The Govt of A.P., reptd by its Secretary,Consumer AffaiRs.Food and Civil Supplies Department, Hyderabad and another....Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.K.Ananda Rao Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Civil Supplies : ?.CITATIONS: NIL HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.20088 of 2013 The Court made the following: ORDER: The petitioner is an LPG distributor of the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (for short 'the Oil Company').Respondent No.2 is the licensing authority under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Petroleum Products (Licensing and Regulation of Supplies) Order, 1980 (for short 'the Control Order').He is also the disciplinary authority who is empowered to cancel or suspend the license, if the licensee or his agent or servant or any other per...
i.Venkateswa Vs. State, Represented by Public Prosecutor,
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-11-2013
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR Crl.P. No.4346 of 2010 dated:11-7-2013 I.Venkateswarlu ..Petitioner State, represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A,.P., Hyderabad, and another...Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri O.Manohar Reddy Counsel for the first respondent: Public Prosecutor Counsel for the second respondent: Sri Nazeer Khan ?.citations:1. 2001 Crl.L.J.3505(1) 2 2006(2) ALT (crl) 224 (SC) 3 (2009) 3 SCC3984 2006(2) ALD (crl) 243 (AP) 5 2012(1) ALD (crl) 744 (AP) THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR Crl.P.No.4346/2010 ORDER: The petitioner who is an accused in CC No.130/2010 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Bhainsa, filed the present Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeking quashing of proceedings in the said CC, which was taken on file against him for an offence punishable under Section 500 IPC.2. The allegations in the complaint are as follows: The second respondent was Ex-Municipal Chairman of Bhainsa Municipality for two...
1.V.Ramesh Babu S/O. Ranga Rao, Aged 48 Vs. 1.State of A.P. Rep.by P.P ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-11-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.13568 OF2010Dated:11. 07-2013 1.V.Ramesh Babu S/o. Ranga Rao, aged 48 years, occupation: Business,r/o. PlotNo.526 MIG-2, Road No.1, KPHB Colony, Hyderabad-500 085. 2.S.Ram Mohan S/o. S.V.Purnachander Rao,aged 47 years, occupation: Finance Manager in VR Equipments & Consumables Pvt. Ltd., r/o. Balajinagar, Kukatpally,Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONERS/ A-1 & A-2 1.State of A.P. rep.by P.P. High Court, Hyderabad...... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT2 M/s. Goutham Printers rep.by its Sole Proprietor A.Manikyala Rao S/o. Venkat Swamy, aged about:38. years, Occ: Business, Having their office at H.No.1-73/1, BJP office road,Kukatpally, Ranga Reddy District. .... RESPONDENT/ DEFACTO COMPLAINANT Counsel for Petitioners:Sri P.Prabhakar Reddy & G.Mallesham. Counsel for Respondent : Public Prosecutor GIST : HEAD NOTE : ?.Cases referred :2012. (2) ALD (Crl.) 211 (AP) (2007)12 SCC page 1 (2005)10 Supreme Court Cases 228 (2010)10 S...
Samudrala Satyanaraya Vs. the State of A.P. and Othe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-11-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.20187 OF2013dated:11.07.2013 Samudrala Satyanarayana....Petitioner The State of A.P. and others... Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri J.C.H.Y.Narasimham Counsel for Respondents: Government Pleader for Home : : ?.Cases referred:2013. 3) ALT711(F.B.) THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.20187 OF2013ORDER : This writ petition suffers from serious laches since the incidents, which the petitioner claims as cause of action to this writ petition, have occurred in 2001 and even the last representation was made in the year 2004.2. The petitioner is alleged to have been wrongfully confined by respondent No.5, who was the then Sub-Inspector of Police at Madhira Police Station, during 29-05-2001 to 04-06-2001 in connection with Crime No.218/SI-CI/2001 dated 09-04- 2001 for the offence under Section 379 IPC. In the said crime, the petitioner was not shown as accused and it was registered against some unknown persons. It i...
M/S Birla Sun Life Insurance Co.Ltd., by Its Managing Director and Ano ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-10-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member)1. Feeling aggrieved by the order of the District Forum, the opposite party has filed appeal contending that the District Forum has not considered the evidence on record in correct perspective. It is contended that the insured submitted proposal after reading and understanding the contents of the applications and terms and conditions of the policy contract. It is contended that the insured had undergone treatment for cancer from 5.11.2009 to 01.06.2010. He was aware of the fact during reinstatement of the policy. He was in the habit of smoking for a period of 8 years which he did not reveal in the proposal. It is contended that material facts such such as the state of health of insured, his age, occupation and habits etc are within the knowledge of the insured and have a bearing on the risk of his life. 2. The point for consideration is whether the insured suppressed any material fact as regards his illness and treatment while obtaining insur...
Barupati Sunitha Vs. the Branch Manager, Lic of India and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-10-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. She filed complaint claiming the sum assured under the life insurance policy obtained by her deceased husband which was refused to be paid by the respondent-insurance corporation on the premise that the insured suppressed the fact that he had undergone surgery for treatment of Glioma prior to taking the insurance policy. 2. The appellants husband during his lifetime obtained life insurance policy bearing number 688511762 from the respondent-insurance company for the period of 21 years commencing from 18.03.2009 for sum assured of Rs.1,00,000/-. The appellants husband died on 10.07.2010 and after the death of her husband, the appellant lodged claim with the respondent -insurance company. The respondent has not paid the claim amount on the premise that the insured concealed the fact that he was suffering from Glioma. The appellant submitted that her husband did not suppress any material fact wh...
Sbi Life Insurance Co. Ltd., Central Processing Centre Vs. Jade Nagala ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-10-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The opposite party no.2 is the appellant. The respondent no. 1 to 4 filed complaint claiming an amount of `5 lakh with interest @ 12% per annum and costs. 2. The fifth respondent sanctioned loan an amount of `5,00,000/- under loan account bearing number 62093841013 and in favour of the first respondent husband and the appellant issued insurance cover under Master Policy No.83001000507 in favour of the respondent no.5 and individual insurance policies to the loan account holders who included the husband of the respondent no.1. The risk cover tapers down as the EMIs get paid. The first respondent husband died on 23.06.2010 and the outstanding loan amount as on the date of his death is Rs.4,80,175/- and to the extent of the same amount is the ambit of risk cover on the date of his death. 3. The appellant issued the insurance policy on submission of Membership Form by the husband of the respondent no.1. After the death of her husband, the fir...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »