Andhra Pradesh Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mirza Yousuf Beig Vs. T. Krishna Murthy Retd. Horticulture Officer Gun ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-08-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. Aggrieved by the order of dismissal of his complaint, the complainant has filed appeal contending that the District Forum failed to consider that the complaint was filed within the period of limitation and that the District Forum failed to consider list of allottees of whom some are not the members of the society nor the employees of the Municipal Corporation, Guntur. It is contended that the District Forum has not considered the evidence on record in correct perspective. 2. The appellant filed complaint claiming for allotment of plot on receipt of a sum of Rs.47,000/- from him and direction to the respondent to pay an amount of Rs.40,000/- towards compensation and a sum of Rs.10,000/- towards costs. The averments of the complaint are that the respondent, an employee of Municipal Corporation, along with other employees of the Municipal Corporation, formed a society under the name and style of Guntur Municipal Superior Employees Co-operati...
Dr.Dharmakshak, S/O Late A.Nagoji Rao, a Vs. the Government of , Rep.b ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-08-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.39366 OF2012AND BATCH0807-2013 Dr.Dharmakshak, S/o Late A.Nagoji Rao, Aged.57 yeaRs.Director, Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjagutta, Hyderabad...Petitioner The Government of , Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Medical & Health Dept., Secretariate, Hyderabad...Respondents 2.Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjagutta, Hydearabad. 3.Dr.K.R.Balaram, S/0 K.R.Krishna, aged about 41 yeaRs.R/o Sr.Sai Soudha, MP,MLA, Colony, Road no.10c, Jubi;ee Jills, Hyderabad...Respondents. Counsel for the Petitioner:Sr.Kasa Jagnmohan Reddy Counsel for the Respondents:Ms.Nanda : ?.Ciatation: Common Order: Both these writ petitions are taken up together for consideration as the subject matter in both the cases is related to the Office of the Director of Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad (NIMs.for short).WP No.39366 of 2012 is instituted seeking a writ of Quo Warranto calling upon the 2nd respondent to show his autho...
The Secretaryto Government,major Irriga Vs. P. Sunder Rami Reddy,s/O. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-08-2013
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT C.M.A.No.518 of 2013 dated:08-07-2013. The Secretary to Government,Major Irrigation Department, Secretariat Buildings,A.P., Hyderabad and five others...APPELLANTS P. Sunder Rami Reddy, S/o. NaRs.Reddy (died as per L.R's) AND OTHERS.RESPONDENTS Counsel for the appellants: Government Pleader for Arbitration Counsel for the respondents : Sr.P. Vinayaka Swamy : ?.CITATIONS: (1) AIR1967SC990THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT C.M.A.No.518 of 2013 JUDGMENT: - (Per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) The fiRs.respondent was awarded a civil contract by the appellants through an agreement, dated 09.12.1976. The work was to be completed within a period of one year from the date of agreement. However, the fiRs.respondent did not complete the work and has cited disturbances said to have been caused on account of cyclone and fall of sky-lab. It was only on 31....
Vasireddi Simhacha Vs. the District Collector (Cs),vizianagaram
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-08-2013
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.4433 of 2012 datede:8-7-2013 Vasireddi Simhachalam.Petitioner The District Collector (CS),Vizianagaram District,Vizianagaram and others..Respondents Counsel for petitioner: Sr.Taddi Nageswara Rao for Sr.Geddam Satish Babu Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3 : Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies Counsel for respondent No.4 : Sr.C. Upendra ,GIST: HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED : Nil The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a mandamus to set-aside notification dated 9-2-2012 issued by respondent No.2 whereby he has invited applications for filling up of the post of fair price shop No.1 of Pakki village, Bobbili Mandal, Vizianagaram District, without cancelling the previous notification dated 12-7- 2008, as illegal and arbitrary. I have heard Sr.Taddi Nageswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies and Sr.C. Upendra, learned counsel for respondent No.4...
Manupati Sarojana Vs. the Branch Manager Lic of India and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-05-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The appellants husband during his lifetime obtained life insurance policy bearing number 688141318 from the respondent-insurance company for a period of 14 years from 15.5.2008 for sum assured Rs.50,000/- The appellants husband died on 29.07.2008 and after the death of her husband, the appellant lodged claim with the respondent -insurance company. The respondent has not paid the claim amount on the premise that the insured concealed the fact that he was suffering from acute pancreatitis. 2. The respondent -insurance company resisted the claim on the premise that the insured was suffering from acute pancreatitis prior to obtaining the insurance policy and he was treated in Jaya Hospital, Hanamkonda from 29.7.2008. In the hospital record his past medical history was recorded as chronic alcoholic and a case of hepatomegaly. The insured suppressed the material fact of his ill health while submitting the proposal form. 3. The appellant has fi...
National Insurance Company Limited Rep. by Its Branch Manager Vs. Chil ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-05-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The opposite party is the appellant. The appeal is challenge to the order of the District forum whereby the complaint was allowed by awarding a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with interest @ 9% per annum together with compensation of Rs.5,000/- and costs. 2. The respondent obtained two insurance policies from the appellant-insurance company for one lakh each. The appellant-insurance company issued Janata Personal Accident Insurance Policy bearing number 550507/47/04/9660283 for a period of 5 years from 03.03.2005 to 02.03.2010 and Personal Accident Insurance Policy bearing number for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- for the period from 07.03.2008 to 06.03.2009. The respondent obtained two insurance policies from United India Insurance Company, the insurance policy bearing number 550507/42/07/8100000311for for the period from 14.03.2008 to 13.03.2009 and the policy bearing number 150804/47/07/51/44 for the period from 01.01.2008 to 1.12.2012. 3. The responden...
The A.P. Co-operative Housing Societies Federation Ltd. Baghlingampall ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-05-2013
Oral Order: (M. Shreesha, Member) 1) Aggrieved by the order in CC No. 72/2012 on the file of the Dist. Forum, Guntur, opposite party No. 2 preferred this appeal and along with it the above application to condone delay of 182 days in filing the appeal on the ground that the copy of the order in C.C. No. 72/2012 passed on 6.11.2012 has not been received by the petitioner/appellant and it came to know about the order only after receipt of notice in the matter. The delay is neither intentional nor deliberate but delay is only due to non-receipt of copy of the order. The petitioner/appellant counsel advised to prefer the appeal as there are good chances of succeeding the matter and therefore prayed that the delay may be condoned. 2) In the light of the fact that delay was 182 days without any material whatsoever to substantiate the delay, we do not wish to order any notice to the respondent as no improvement could be made by the petitioner/appellant in regard to her plea. The provisions of ...
NajamuddIn Kazi, S/O.Shahudd Vs. Mohd. Abdul Aziz, S/O.Late Mohd. Ibra ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-05-2013
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI N. RAVI SHANKAR C.R.P. No.1996 of 2012 dated:05-07-2013 Najamuddin Kazi, S/o.Shahuddin... Petitioner Mohd. Abdul Aziz, S/o.Late Mohd. Ibrahim... Respondent Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Narayan Lakxman Rao Counsel for the respondent: Sri M.A.K. Mukheed : ?.Citations: (1) 2011 (4) ALD757THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1996 of 2012 ORDER: Heard Sri Narayan Laxman Rao, the learned counsel for petitioner/defendant and Sri M.A.K.Mukheed, the learned counsel for respondent/plaintiff.2. The point in this defendant's revision is whether an order passed by the trial court under Order XV-A (A.P.Amendment) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, treating him as the tenant of the plaintiff in a suit for eviction and directing him to deposit arrears of rents and future rents can be said to be valid and proper.3. The point arises in the following circumstances. Hereinafterwards, the parties shall be referred to as they are arrayed in t...
Salapu Ramana and Oth Vs. Salapu Sanyasi
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-05-2013
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P.No.2572 of 2011 dated:05-07-2013 Salapu Ramana & others ..Petitioners Salapu Sanyasirao ..Respondent Counsel for the petitioners : Sr.K.V.Simhadri Counsel for the respondent : Sr.T.V.S.Prabhakar Rao HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P.No.2572 of 2011 ORDER: The respondent filed O.S.No.226 of 2009 in the Court of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Anakapalli, against the petitioners herein, for the relief of perpetual injunction in respect of, as many as 21 items of suit schedule property, which are agricultural lands of small bits. He has also filed I.A.No.814 of 2009 under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C., for injunction against the petitioneRs.He narrated the manner in which, he is said to have acquired the rights over the property, after the death of his father, and the nature of rights, being exercised by him, vis--vis the land. He alleged that the petitioners were interfering with his possessi...
A.P.State Road Transport Corporation, Mu Vs. Mohd.Fasiuddin, E.40624, ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-05-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR w.p.No.23978 of 2002 REVIEW W.P.M.P.No.6746 of 2006 Dated 05-07-2013 A.P.State Road Transport Corporation, Mushirabad, Hyderabad, rep. by its Managing Director and others....Petitioners Mohd.Fasiuddin, E.40624, Ex.Conductor, A.P.S.R.T.C.Bus Depot, Nizamabad, H.No.9-12-134/1, Ahmedputa, Nizamabad & other...Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : Sr.V.T.M.Prasad, Learned Standing Counsel for A.P.S.R.T.C.Counsel for the respondents : HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred REVIEW W.P.M.P.No.6746 of 2006 in WRIT PETITION No.23978 of 2002 ORDER: The only contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners in this review petition is that having found cash and ticket irregularities, the A.P.State Road Transport Corporation suspended the 1st respondent and once he is suspended, the employee is entitled for subsistence allowance and that the order of this Court shows that the 1st respondent is entitled for regular salary, even during the period of suspension. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »