Andhra Pradesh Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Authorized Officer and Ano Vs. Surapaneni Vani Padmav
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-04-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT A.S.No.478 of 2012 dated:04-07-2013 The Authorized Officer and another..Appellant Surapaneni Vani Padmavathi..Respondents Counsel for the appellant: Sr.E. Ajay Reddy Counsel for the Respondents : Sr.Y. Subrahmanyam HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred Z) (2009) 8 SCC3662) (2011) 2 SCC7823) (2004) 4 SCC3114) AIR1955Mad 135 5) AIR1955Mad 491 (Judgment of the Bench delivered by the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT A.S.No.478 of 2012 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) One V. Rosaiah obtained loan from Vijayawada Branch of Vijaya Bank, Eluru Road, the 2nd respondent herein, by mortgaging an item of immovable property. Since he did not repay the borrowed amount, the Authorized Officer of the Bank, the 1st respondent herein, published a sale notice on 07-01-2009, proposing to sell the mortgaged item of property. In th...
B. Muralidhar and 4 OThe Vs. the State of A.P.,rep.by Public Prosecut
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-04-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR Crl.R.C. No.865 of 2013 dated:04-07-2013 B. Muralidhar and 4 others... Petitioners/Accused The State of A.P.,rep.by Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad,and another.. Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Smt. P. Rajani Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: Public Prosecutor for R.1 Sri D. Kodanda Rami Reddy for R-2 : ?.Cases referred:1. (2011)3 SCC6262.(2010) 1 SCC750HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR Crl.R.C.No.865 of 2013 ORDER: The petitioners are A.1 to A.5. A.1 is the Sub-Inspector of Police. A.2 to A.5 are police constables. The de facto complainant by name P. Venkata Narayana Reddy, who is the second respondent was allegedly tortured by police to such an extent that his mother- in-law, who could not bear it, committed suicide on 04.11.2003. A private complaint was filed by the de facto complainant against the five petitioners for the offence under Sections 300, 348, 506 and 306 read with Section149 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Sanction was ...
M/S. Sona Poultry Farm, a Proprietorship Firm Rep by Its Proprietor Vs ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
Oral Common Order: (T. Ashok Kumar, Member) 1. These complaints are fled U/s. 17(1)(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act praying this Commission to direct the opposite parties 1 and 2 jointly and severally to pay insured amounts together with interest and also compensation described in the respective complaints. Since in all the three complaints, the parties are same and similar facts and law are involved we intend to dispose of all the said complaints by a common order. CC 88/2012 is taken as lead case. 2. The brief facts of the complaint in CC 88/2012 are that the complainant had obtained loan of Rs.30 lakhs from 1st opposite party bank for the purpose of his poultry business and to safeguard its interests, the bank had taken an insurance policy bearing No. 051100/11/08/11/00000971 from the second opposite party covering the period from 26.12.2008 to 25.12.2009 for an amount of Rs.50 lakhs covering the risk on the stocks of eggs and poultry feed . while the things thus stood, on 02.1...
Smt Purma Andalu,w/O Purma Anjaiah Vs. the Govt of A.P., Reptd by Its ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.18952 of 2013 Date: 03-07-2013 Smt Purma Andalu,W/o Purma Anjaiah ....Petitioner The Govt of A.P., Reptd by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Hyderabad and five others......Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.K.Pradeep Kumar Counsel for the Respondents: AGP for Civil Supplies : ?.CITATIONS: NIL ORDER: Lack of proper application of mind and approach by respondent Nos.5 and 6 has driven the petitioner to this needless litigation. The petitioner is functioning as a fair price shop dealer from the year 1997. Her husband was elected as one of the Directors of a local Primary Agricultural Co-Operative Society (for short 'PACS') in the elections held recently. Respondent No.6 has issued memo No.B/220/2013, dated 16.04.2013, wherein he has informed the petitioner that the Villagers of Aroor approached respondent No.5 to take action for discontinuing the petitioner in view of election of her husband as a Director of...
Deshopanthula Shail Vs. the Indian Oil Corporation Limited (iocl
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.25160 of 2012 dated:03-07-2013 Deshopanthula Shailaja...Petitioner The Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL).Mumbai and others...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.V.Ram Chandar Rao Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3: Sr.P.Prabhakar, standing counsel for IOCL Counsel for Respondent No.4: Sr.Y.Rama Rao : : ?.Cases referred: THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY ORDER: In response to the advertisement issued by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited (for short 'the Corporation').the petitioner and respondent No.4 applied for award of retail outlet dealership for sale of diesel at Sultanabad Village on the road leading to Peddapalli road in Karimnagar District. Following the evaluation of the credentials of the petitioner and respondent No.4, the Corporation has empanelled both the applicants. Eventually, the petitioner was declared as not qualified and respondent No.4 was assigned rank No.1. Questioning this action, the ...
M/S.Rollon Steels, Khairtabad, Hyuderaba Vs. A.P.Transco Ltd.,(Formerl ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.C.C.C.A No.114 OF1999dated:03-07-2013 M/S.rOLLON sTEELS, Khairtabad, Hyuderabad, rep.by Managing Prter, I.H..Abedi, S/o S.H.Ahsan Abedi, aged.58 yeaRs.R/o Hyderabad ..Appellant A.P.Transco Ltd.,(formerly known as A.P.State Electricity Board) Vidyuth Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, repbye its Secr5etary...Respoindent Counsel for the appellant:Sr.V.Srinivas Counsel for orespondent: O.Manohar Reddy : ?.Citations: JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Sr.Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) The respondent herein filed O.S.No.858 of 1984 in the Court of the II Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, against the appellant for recovery of a sum of Rs.9,36,329/-. The trial Court decreed the suit through judgment, dated 21.10.1998. Hence, this appeal. The background of the case is as under: The respondent is a state owned undertaking involved in the activity of transmission of electricity supply. Its predecessor is Andhra Pradesh State Ele...
Kamal Kishore Biyani, C/O Satyanarayana Vs. Shyam Sunder Bung, S/O Sat ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-03-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Criminal Revision Case No.2076 of 2012 dated:05-7-2013 Kamal Kishore Biyani, C/o Satyanarayana Biyani, Aged about 48 years, Occ: Business, R/o H.No.5-8-292/1, Mahesh Nagar Colony, Chirag Ali Lane, Hyderabad... Petitioner/Petitioner/Accused No.1 Shyam Sunder Bung, S/o Satyanarayana Bung, Aged about 48 years, Occ: Business, R/o H.No.5-3-828/1, Shankar Bagh, Goshamahal, Hyderabad; and 3 others... Respondents/Complainant Counsel for the petitioner:Sri Sharad Sanghi Counsel for respondent No.1:Sri S.Ashok Anandkumar Counsel for respondents 2 and 3: None Counsel for respondent No.4: Public Prosecutor : : ?.Cases referred:1. AIR2006SC4332. (2012) 10 SCC3033. (2012) 3 SCC255HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Criminal Revision Case No.2076 of 2012 Judgment: The order dated 03-8-2012 in Crl.M.P.No.2250 of 2011 in C.C.No.614 of 2004 on the file of the II Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, is assailed through the present revision. The petitioner, who ...
Sreekanth Ramadugu Vs. Beam Telecom Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by Its Chief Execut ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-02-2013
Oral Order: (T. Ashok Kumar, Member) 1. This is an appeal preferred by the unsuccessful complainant as against the orders dated 22.06.2012 in CC 156/2012on the file of the District Consumer Forum -1, Hyderabad. For convenience sake, the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to as under : 2. The brief facts of the complaint are that the complainant, who is a Software Engineer, has paid Rs.3,300/- towards Internet subscription charges on 29.06.2011 vide cash receipt dated 29.06.2011 to the opposite party on inducement. Thereafter, despite many requests, reminders and e-mails, the OP failed to install Internet connection as promised and hence he could not complete the work entrusted to him by his employer and as a consequence of the same he was subjected to mental agony and hardship and his reputation was lost and hence he got issued a legal notice on 02.09.2011 to the OP but there was no response from them and hence the complaint to direct the OP to return the amount of Rs.3,3...
L. Madhusudhan Reddy Vs. the Tahsildar-cum-deputy Collector Mandal Rev ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jul-02-2013
Oral Order: (T. Ashok Kumar, Member) (1) This is an appeal preferred by the unsuccessful complainant as against the orders dated 13.09.2012 in CC 170/2011 on the file of the District Consumer Forum, Ranga Reddy. For convenience sake, the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to as under : (2) The brief facts of the complaint are that when the complainant, who is a Government employee, wanted to execute a registered sale deed in favour of prospective purchaser of his plot in Bahadurpally village, Quthbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, the Sub-Register Quthbullapur refused to register the same on the ground that there was prohibition of Registration of Lands in Bahadurpally village. Thereafter vide letter dated 11.04.2011 he requested the Public Information Officer, Revenue Department, A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad to furnish a copy of Andhra Pradesh Gazette part I, Extraordinary No. 134 , dt.10.03.2005 Notification by the Government (i) Prohibition of Registration of Govern...
Mohammed Abdul Hameed Khursh Vs. Zulfikhar Ahmed and Two Oth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-02-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY C.R.P.No.3636 of 2006 dated:02-07-2013 Mohammed Abdul Hameed Khursheed.Petitioner Zulfikhar Ahmed and two others.Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Sr.L. Prabhakar Reddy Counsel for 1st respondent : Sr.B. Nalin Kumar Counsel for 2nd respondent: Sr.M.A.Mukheed HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED : 1) AIR2004SC20492) AIR2007SC11033) AIR2007SC3401) 4) (2001) 8 SCC7185) (2006) 11 SCC676) (2007) 7 SCC4827) AIR1997SC37608) 1996 (2) ALD683(D.B) 9) 2012 (4) ALD385(DB) 10) (1991) 1 SCC34311) AIR1999SC250712) (2010) 6 SCC25713) (1993) 1 SCC49914) (1980) 4 SCC259THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3636 of 2006 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioner/plaintiff against the judgment and decree, dated 04.04.2006, in O.S.No.56 of 1998 on the file of the Andhra Pradesh Wakf Tribunal, Hyderabad (the Tribunal).For the sake of convenience and to avoid ambiguity in the discussion, the parties will be referred to h...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »