Andhra Pradesh Court December 2009 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
National Insurance Company Ltd., Vs. the Singareni Colleries Company L ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-03-2009
Oral Order :(Per Smt. M.Shreesha , Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.31/2004 on the file of District Forum-1, Hyderabad, the opposite party preferred this appeal. The main case of the complainant is that the opposite party issued policy for various vehicles belonging to the complainant, the validity of the policy being 17.11.1995 to 16.11.1996 and there was a fire accident and the complainant made the claim for Rs.19,88,659/-. It is the case of the opposite party that the Government of India has set up Permanent Machinery of Arbitration (PMA) in Department of Public Enterprises (DPE) under Ministry of Industries, Govt. of India to settle and adjudicate the disputes and the complainant ought to have approached and availed this institution for adjudication before approaching this Forum. Thereafter the opposite party filed I.A.No508/2005 seeking direction to take up the preliminary issue whether the C.D. is maintainable or not. They challenged the maintainability of the C....
K. Shiva Kumar Vs. Smt.K. Suchitra and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-02-2009
(Sri K.Satyanand,Honble Member) This is an appeal filed by the unsuccessful complainant assailing the order of the District Forum that went against him. During the course of this appeal, the appellant died and his L.Rs namely, his wife and his minor children were brought on record as appellants 2 and 3. The facts that led to filing this appeal are briefly as follows: Originally the deceased complainant was running a public call office at Jawahar Road, Nizamabad. The respondent proprietorship firm was dealing in computers having its business at Nizamabad itself. According to the complainant, opposite party had two proprietors by name A.Rajender and A.Srinivas. Both were the sons of Shanker. Though the said assertion sounds anomalous, may be it was a business carried on by two brothers jointly. Attracted by the sale of computers advertised by the opposite party and on account of their affinity, the complainant claimed to have been lured into starting a business of internet caf. In that...
The Secretary, the Primary Agricultural Co.Op Credit Society Bedinehal ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-02-2009
Oral Order (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) These two appeals arise out of the order passed in C.D.No.426 of 2002 by the District Forum Kurnool. The opposite party no.2 has preferred F.A.No.742 of 2007 whereas the complainant filed F.A.No.839 of 2007. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the husband of the complainant Boya Dubbanna @ Erranna during his life time was a member of the opposite party no.2 society. The opposite party no.2 obtained Group Insurance Policy for coverage of risk for a sum of Rs. One lakh each to its Members. The husband of the complainant died on 2.9.2001 due to snake bite. The complainant being the nominee of her husband under the insurance policy lodged claim by submitting a certificate issued by Grampanchayat along with other relevant documents through the opposite party no.2 to the opposite party no.1.The matter was not reported to the police nor any case was registered as the death was not a medico-legal case. The complainant has got issued notice ...