Andhra Pradesh Court December 2009 Judgments

Batchu Subba Lakshmi and ors. Vs. Sannidhi Srinivasulu and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(1)ALT483

ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. Lok Adalat, Nandyal, Kurnool District, passed order/award dated 07.2.2004 in the matter of O.S. No. 1 of 2004 in terms of the compromise and settlement among respondents 1, 2 and 4, who at the relevant time, are partners of third respondent firm. The petitioners who are not parties either to the suit or to the award passed by Lok Adalat filed instant writ petition after lapse of about five years challenging the same. This Court initially granted interim orders staying execution proceedings and when respondents 1 and 2 moved application to vacate interim orders, with the consent of rival parties, the matter is heard and is being disposed of finally.Petitioners' case2. The case of petitioners as alleged in the affidavit accompanying writ petition is as follows. Third respondent firm was constituted on 29.6.1997 with respondents 1, 2 and 4 as its partners. The said partnership was reconstituted with effect from 01.4.2003 when respondents 1 and 2 withdrew from the fir...

Lakkavajjula Srinivasa Siva Shankara Prasad Vs. Oriental Bank of Comme ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order : (Per Smt. M. Shreesha, Honble Member ) Aggrieved by order in C.D.No.346/2004 on the file of District Forum,Guntur, the complainant preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the case are that the complainant opened Savings Bank Account bearing no.1446 with the opposite party in October,2000. The complainant had also other accounts with the opposite party branches at Vijayawada and also Hyderabad and from his Hyderabad Branch an amount of Rs.9 lakhs was sent to the opposite party Branch and the same was received by transfer by the opposite party on 21.10.2000 and was credited to his account. Complainant withdrew an amount of Rs.1,50,000/- from his account no.1446 and submits that the balance amount should have been credited to his account. Opposite party branch did not issue a copy of his account because of certain differences and the complainant submits that he sent a legal notice on 13.12.2001 demanding copy of his account and the opposite party branch informed...

Bapu Neela Krishna B Vs. Vodafone Essar South Limited

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

(Sri K. Satyanand,Honble Member) This is an appeal filed by the unsuccessful complainant before the District Forum assailing the order of the District Forum that dismissed his complaint. The facts of the case are briefly as follows: The complainant is a customer of the opposite party having obtained a pre paid mobile connection from the opposite party, a Telecom service provider. It is the chief grievance of the complainant that the opposite party activated FSMS service on his phone which he earlier deactivated, without any prior intimation. Aggrieved by the same, the complainant called the customer care about it, who thereupon asked him to send a message as FSMS No. He claimed to have followed up as directed and soon he got a confirmation message that his request would be actioned within 24 hours from Happy 2 help. He received the said message at 20.55.48 sec. p.m on 10-8-2008 from message centre with number +919886005444. Subsequently he claimed to have called the customer care and ...

M/S Shriram Chits (P) Ltd., Branch Manager Vs. Kandula Dastagiraiah Ka ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) The opposite party is the appellant. The appeal is directed against the order of the District Forum, Kadapa in C.C.No.75 of 2008. The respondent filed complaint stating that he subscribed to chit, PDXL-1/10 for a sum of Rs.5 lakhs conducted by the appellant company. In the auction of the chit, the respondent was declared highest bidder. Subsequently the respondent failed to pay the balance instalments resulting in filing of suit O.S.No.15 of 2002 by the appellant company before the Senior Civil Judge, Produttur which was decreed exparte. The appellant filed E.P.No.3 of 2007 wherein warrant was issued against one of the sureties of the respondent. In pursuance of the direction of the court, the District Educational Officer stopped disbursing the retirement benefits to the surety. Thereupon the respondent entered into the settlement by paying a sum of Rs.one lakh to the appellant on 31.3.2007 as also it was agreed that the balance amount of Rs....

The Telegraph Traffic Employees Co-op Credit Society Depositors’ ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order ( As per R.Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) The petitioner a third party, which claims to be a depositors forum of the Telegraph Traffic Employees Co-op Credit Society Depositors Forum intends to be impleaded as one of the opposite parties to the complaint alleging that the complainants were non-members of opposite party no.1 society. At the instance of the depositors of the society, proceedings were initiated u/s 50 of the A.P. Cooperative Societies Act wherein respondent no.6 was appointed as person-in-charge to manage the affairs of the society. In fact society had to pay huge amounts to depositors 2452 in number. Some of them had formed depositors forum, the petitioner herein with an object to get back their deposits. The members of the depositors forum includes senior citizens, retired persons and others. In fact a Writ Petition No.21858 of 2009 is filed for appointment of liquidator to disburse the amounts collected on prorata basis and the High Court by its order dated 29...

P. Damodar Reddy Vs. the Director of Insurance Medical Services, Andhr ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

(Sri K. Satyanand,Honble Member) This is an appeal filed by the opposite party respondent before the District Forum assailing the order passed by it in P.P.No.125/2004 in C.D.No.189/2003. The facts that led to filing this appeal are briefly as follows: The appellant was a Government Pleader. He was engaged to appear in a matter in which the respondent herein was interested for proper adjudication before the Employees insurance court and Chairman, Industrial Tribunal, Hyderabad. It was alleged that the appellant failed to appear before the said court and thereby turned out to be instrumental in getting an order adverse to the interests of the respondent. Thereupon the respondent filed C.D against the appellant for deficiency in service as a legal professional. After enquiry, the District Forum passed an order dated 15-12-2003 in favour of the respondent herein and against the appellant directing the later to pay an amount of Rs.15,660/- along with compensation of Rs.2,000/- and costs of...

S.A. Burhan Vs. P. Sudhaka and Another

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order (R.Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. The appeal is preferred against the order of the District forum, Nellore in C.C.No.155 of 2006. The facts of the case as set out in the complaint are that the appellant has been running business under the name style of Rajesh Travels at Nellore. The opposite party no.1 is the collection agent of the opposite partyno.2 for the purpose of collecting daily deposit from the public including the appellant. The appellant no.1 used to issue bank receipts signed by the respondent no.2 for the amount received from the appellant. The appellant paid Rs.200/- per day starting from 6.10.2005 till 23.7.2006 for which the respondent no.1 issued receipts for an amount of Rs.57,600/-. Thereafter, the appellant paid an amount of Rs.200/- per day for 7 days to the respondent no.1 for which the respondent no.1 had not issued any receipts. On 28.7.2006 the appellant on enquiry came to know that the respondent no.1 mis...

Dr. G. Supriya D/O. Sri G. Ramesh and ors. Vs. Dr. N.T.R. University o ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(1)ALT446

ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The subject matter of these three writ petitions is similar. Hence, they are disposed of through a common order. For the sake of convenience, the petitioners in W.P. No. 8600 of 2009 and W.P. No. 8800 of 2009 are referred to as petitioners 1 and 2 and the petitioner in W.P. No. 8603 of 2009 is referred to as the 3rd petitioner.2. Petitioners 1 and 2 were admitted to the first year of M.D. (Anatomy) and M.D. (General Medicine) courses respectively in Gandhi Medical College, Secunderabad, in the academic year 2006-2007. The 3rd petitioner was admitted into the first year of M.D. (Physiology) course in the same academic year in the Kakatiya Medical College, Warangal. All the courses are spread over a period of 3 years. Both the colleges are affiliated to Dr. N.T.R. University of Health Sciences ('the University', for brevity). Examination is held by the end of the course. The study comprises mostly of interaction with the professors and is in a way different ...

K.V.N. Bhupal Vs. the State of A.P. Rep. by Its Chief Secretary and an ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(1)ALT521

ORDERA. Gopal Reddy, J.1. In all these batch of writ petitions, cancellation of notification dated 15-04-2007, issued for recruitment to the post of District and Sessions Judge in the Andhra Pradesh State Higher Judicial Services and the selection made in pursuance of the said notification, by the Full Court is under challenge.2. These writ petitions have been heard together because they have common features and raise common issues and they are dealt with common order.3. W.P. No. 6323 of 2009 is filed by a practicing advocate by way of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) and the remaining writ petitions are filed by the candidates, who underwent selection process. 4. In obedience to the general directions issued by the Honourable Supreme Court in Malik Mazhar Sultan v. U.P. Public Service Commission (2006) 4 SCC 509, fixing the time schedule to be adhered to for filling up of vacancies that may arise in Subordinate Courts and District Courts and to effect suitable amendment in the recruit...

Padi Trigunsen Reddy and ors. Vs. P. Jyothi Reddy and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(1)ALT5

ORDERD.S.R. Varma, J.1. Though the original order was passed on 1-12-2009, the matter has been posted under the caption 'For Being Mentioned', hence the original order shall be read as follows.2. Heard Sri K. Vivek Reddy, learned Counsel, representing Sri K. Sai Krishna Mohan Rao, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners; Sri D. Prakash Reddy, learned Senior Counsel, representing Sri A. Prabhkar Rao, learned Counsel appearing for respondents 1 to 4; and the learned Assistant Government Pleader representing the learned Advocate General, appearing for respondents 5 and 6.3. This writ petition is filed by the father and paternal grandparents of the alleged detenues, namely, Kum. Aanchal R. Padi and Kum. Kajal R. Padi, seeking a Writ of habeas corpus directing the respondents 1 to 4 to produce Kum. Aanchal R. Padi and Kajal R. Padi before this Court and the said minor girls be forthwith handed over to the petitioners 2 and 3 to enable them to be returned to petitioner No. 1 so that th...