Andhra Pradesh Court December 2009 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S. United India Insurance Company Ltd Rep. by Its Divisional Manager ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-16-2009
Oral order : ( M. Shreesha, Honble Member ) Aggrieved by the order in C. D. 315/2005 on the file of the District Forum ,Guntur , the opposite parties preferred this appeal The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainants 1 and 2 are the parents of late Md. Esubu Johny who was an electrician and mechanic for Generators and Tractors. The complainants son purchased Servo Oil from Ravi Oil Stores and S. S. Enterprises at Chilakaluripet from 19.7.2003 to 6.8.2003 under five policies, out of which, 4 polices worth Rs.50,000/- each and one policy worth Rs.one lakh. In all, he was covered for Rs. 3 lakhs and the same was insured and the complainant submits that the dealer issued valid bills and the policies to that extent. On 10.08.2003, the insured died in a road accident instantaneously on the spot and the case was also registered in Cr. No. 258/2003 and an inquest and post mortem were also conducted. The opposite parties collected original copies of the policies through...
Col.Tgn Reddy (Retd.) Vs. M/S.Elite Global Finance Ltd., and Elite Fin ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-16-2009
(Sri K. Satyanand,Honble Member) This is an appeal filed by the unsuccessful complainant assailing the order of the District Forum that went against him. The facts that led to filing this appeal are briefly as follows: The complainant alleged that opposite parties 2 to 5, who are the Directors of Opposite party No.1 company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 closed the Opposite party No.1 company on 8-3-1998. Opposite parties 2 to 5 are personally liable to pay the deposit amounts to the complainant to a tune of Rs.1,44,500/- and disappeared from the night of 8-3-1998. On 12-3-1998, the complainant lodged a complaint before the Station House Officer, Kharkhana and also submitted his claim for Rs.1,44,500/- to Reserve Bank of India, Hyderabad on 18-3-1998. Inspite of several reminders, the opposite parties failed to pay the deposited amount to the complainant and therefore the complainant approached the Forum for various reliefs as prayed in the complaint. Opposite party No.1 file...
M/S.Orange Auto Ltd., Rep. by Its Managing Director and Another Vs. Ku ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-16-2009
(Sri K. Satyanand,Honble Member) These two appeals are disposed of by a common order since both the appeals arise out of the same C.D The appeal i.e. F.A.No.576/2006 was filed by the opposite party assailing the order of the District Forum directing them to refund Rs.2,70,000/- out of which the opposite parties 1and 2 have already paid Rs.2,60,000/- and to pay the balance amount of Rs.10,000/- to the complainant along with repair charges of car Rs.10,037.75 and also pay Rs.10,000/- towards compensation and costs of Rs.2,000/-. The appeal, F.A.No.927/2009 is filed by the complainant dis-satisfied with the reliefs granted by the District Forum. The facts that led to filing these appeals are briefly as follows The complainant was a student of 1st MBBS course in Deccan College of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad. The complainant submitted that her parents intended to present her a car in the event of her getting admission in the Medical college and to attend classes for training. The complaina...
M/S. Datta Sai Industries (Known as M/S. Sri Datta Sai Industries) Vs. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-14-2009
Oral Order: (Per Honble Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) This is a complaint claiming compensation and expenses for the loss of stock in trade covered under the insurance policy . 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that it is a partnership firm doing business in rice mill, purchasing paddy, milling it, polishing the rice and delivering the fine rice to the Food Corporation of India (FCI) and exporting remaining rice to various dealers in Andhra Pradesh and other States. It stocks huge quantities of paddy and fine rice. It has insured its building, plant, machinery and other accessories for Rs. 72 lakhs with the opposite party insurance company valid from 13.12.2005 to 12.12.2006 besides stocks of paddy, rice, broken rice, gunny bags, and other packing materials for Rs. 85 lakhs valid for the same period at the instance of State Bank of India to whom it hypothecated the above said properties. While so, there were heavy rains for more than 7 days from 15.9.2006 to 22.9.2006 res...
United India Insurance Co.Ltd., Rep. by Its Branch Manager Vs. G. Srin ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-14-2009
Oral Order (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) The appeal is filed by the opposite party challenging the order of the District Forum-I Hyderabad in C.C.No.356 of 2006. The facts in brief are that the respondent is the owner of Opel Astra bearing No.AP-9Q 6231 which was purchased by him from K.Durga Rao in the year 2004. The appellant issued insurance policy bearing No.050503/31/04/10275 in favour of the previous owner of the vehicle. On 21.2.2005 when the vehicle was proceeding to Vijayawada from Hyderabad, it met with an accident at Kanchikacherla when a lorry bearing No.AP 5U 2239 proceeding in the same direction hit it from behind on account of which the vehicle sustained damage on the left side to its doors. The respondent lodged claim on 24.2.2005 with the appellant for an estimate of Rs.90,000/- towards the repairs of the car. The surveyor appointed by the appellant in this regard, inspected the vehicle and submitted his report to the appellant. The respondent got repaired the vehic...
The Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited Vs. Chi ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-14-2009
Oral Order (Per Smt M. Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.D.No.61/2005 on the file of District Forum , Prakasam Dist at Ongole , the first opposite party preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the case are that the complainants husband was an agriculturist and was a member in Pallamalli Primary Agriculture Cooperative Society and took loan of Rs.19,000/- from the society under Loan Account no.58 and a security of share capital of Rs.1,885/- was taken by the account loan customer in the society and the second opposite party deducted the premium from the amount granted to the complainants husband and paid insurance premiums with opposite party no.1 and the policy was in force as long as the loan is discharged. On 30.1.2003 the insured died due to snake bite which was informed to the opposite parties but they did not pay the amounts. The complainant being an uneducated lady did not file FIR or got post mortem conducted but she is only having a doctor certi...
Chilukoti Yogeswara Rao Vs. Sri Venkateswara Traders Singarayakonda, R ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-14-2009
(Sri K. Satyanand,Honble Member) This is an appeal filed by the unsuccessful complainant assailing the order of the District Forum and seeking the reliefs that he sought in the complaint. The facts stated briefly are as follows: The complainant purchased 45 bags of Raasi gold cement from the opposite party trader on 21-1-2006 paying Rs.5,625/- for the construction of his building particularly the slab. For the same purpose he also invested Rs.40,000/- in iron. The said cement and iron were used in the construction of the slab for his building and he also claimed to have spent Rs.50,000/- towards other expenses in laying the slab. Within 15 days of the construction, the said slab had collapsed in the process of which the cement as also iron became useless and had gone waste. The complainant was put to loss according to him to a tune of Rs.95,625/- besides the mental agony that he suffered in the process. Thus in all he claimed Rs.1,20,625/- with interest and costs. The claim came to be ...
icici Bank Limited, Branch Office, Represented by Its Spa Holder of th ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-11-2009
(Sri K. Satyanand,Honble Member) This is an appeal filed by the opposite party assailing the order of the District Forum imposing liability against the opposite party after finding the opposite party having indulged in unfair trade practice of resorting to aggressive marketing strategy and forcing its in-house insurance scheme automatically upon the credit card holders. The facts that led to filing this appeal are briefly are as follows: The complainant was a subscriber of credit card bearing No.3770415298 006 issued by ICICI bank on 01-3-2007 and submitted that upon request made by the ICICI Lombard General Insurance to join in a health insurance scheme, the complainant gave consent over telephone to join his wife, Smt.Farkhunda Begum under the Health scheme from May, 2007 to April, 2008 for a total sum of Rs.5,820/- payable per month @ EMI of Rs.485/-. It is the case of the complainant that he was receiving irregular monthly bills and received a statement dated 18-8-2007 showing a b...
D.V. Kishan Rao and Another Vs. K.S. Satyanarayana and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-11-2009
(Sri K. Satyanand,Honble Member) This is an appeal filed by one D.V.Kishan Rao, who on the face of it appears to be a third party to the C.D. and the opposite party No.3 in the C.D. against whom virtually there was no order passed by the District Forum in as much as the C.D. against him was dismissed. Thus the very maintainability of this appeal is vitiated for the reasons articulated in greater detail hereunder: As could be seen from the impugned order dated 14-5-2007 passed by the District Forum, it granted relief to the complainant only as against opposite party no.1 in the following terms: In the result, the complaint is allowed directing the opposite party No.1 to pay to the complainant Rs.50,000/- towards the Demand Draft amount with interest at 12% p.a. from 26-7-2005 till the date of realization. It is further directed to pay Rs.5,000/- towards damages and compensation and also pay Rs.1,000/- towards costs of this complaint. This order shall be complied within one month from t...
M/S Sri Hanuma Silk Weavers Co-operative Productionand Sales Society L ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-11-2009
Oral Order ( R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) The complainant is the appellant. The appeal is filed challenging the order of the District Forum Kadapa in C.D.No.67 of 2005. The facts of the case as set out in the complaint are that the appellant, a weavers society was running its business under the name and style of M/s Sri Hanuman Silk Weavers Production and Sales Society Limited at Appannapalli village of Kadapa District. The society was dealing in business of manufacturing of duping cloth and various types of superior fine silk cloths etc. Veekay International Private Limited has placed an order dated 16.9.2003 with the appellants society for supply of 10,000 mtrs Indian silk handloom duping cloth. Accordingly the appellant society had sent 10,000 mtrs of cloth on 13.10.2003 through the respondent no.2 to Kolkata. The cloth was booked with the respondent no.2 in 9 bundles packed in gunny bags and each bundle contained 1 to 12 pieces of handloom silk duping cloth. In all, all the nin...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »