Andhra Pradesh Court December 2009 Judgments

Raghava Estates Ltd, Rep. by Its Managing Director Sri Lingam Ravindra ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Typed to the dictation of Sri K.Satyanand,Honble Member) This is an appeal preferred by the first opposite party against which the District Forum imposed liability for deficiency in service and directed it to pay Rs.19,40,000/- and in addition 10% escalation on the said amount per year (date of commencement and the date till which such escalation has to be paid was not indicated in the order) besides costs in a sum of Rs.25,000/-. The facts that led to filing this appeal are briefly as follows: The complainant is Vishnupuram Colony Welfare Association. It appears the first opposite party, a real estate developer, floated a project by name Vishnupuram Colony in which the members of the complainant association acquired individual houses. While initiating the project, the opposite party promised several attractive facilities including a 60 feet BT road and other BT roads, drainage system, stormwater drainage canals on either side and other facilities in fact in conformity with the conditi...

The Branch Manger, State Bank of India, Adb Branch, Jagtial Mandal, Ka ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order (Per Smt M. Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.30/2007 on the file of District Forum, Karimnagar, the second opposite party preferred F.A.No.1506/2007 and the first opposite party preferred F.A.No. 746/2008. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant in the course of his business dealings with a trading company of Mr.Devender Kumar Mahender Kumar, Delhi purchased a demand draft in the name of Yogesh Trading Company payable at New Delhi for an amount of Rs.39,850/- on 16.9.2006 vide D.D.No.920357 from the opposite party no.2 bank and the same was sent to Sandeep Garments (S.G.) Devender Kumar, Mahender Kumar through registered post ack. due on 16.9.2006 through the opposite partyno.1 post office. Thereafter the said Sandeep Garments company informed the complainant over phone that neither the registered post letter nor demand draft was received by them. Immediately the complainant lodged a complaint dt.7.10.2006 to the Superin...

B. Shekar Vs. Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(1)ALT608

ORDERG.V. Seethapathy, J.1. (i) W.P. No. 21093 of 2009 is filed seeking writ of Mandamsu declaring the action of the first respondent-Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Kurnool in issuing the impugned proceedings Rc. No. 1520/2009-B1, dated 09-09-2009 proposing to conduct no confidence motion in respect of the post of President of Krishnagiri Primary Agricultural Co-operative Society Limited, in the office of 2nd respondent at 11 a.m. on 01-10-2009 as illegal and void and opposed to Articles 14, 19, and 21 of Constitution of India and also contrary to the provisions of Section 34(A) of A.P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1964.(ii) W.P. No. 22613 of 2009 is filed seeking writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the first respondent-deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Kurnool in issuing the impugned proceedings R.C. No. 1520/ 2009-B1, dated 15-10-2009 proposing to conduct no confidence motion in respect of the post of President of Krishnagiri Primary Agricultural Co-operativ...

M/S.Lakshmi Motors Rep. by Its Managing Partner Mr.Pamulapati Rajesh a ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

(Sri K. Satyanand,Honble Member) This is an appeal filed by the opposite parties before the District Forum assailing the order passed by it in C.D.No.265/2006. The facts that led to filing this appeal are as follows: The complainant purchased a Tata Indica Motor car on 29-4-2005 with chasis No.600121BZUP28701 and engine No.4751D105BUZP27701 from the second opposite party and took its delivery through 1st opposite party and the vehicle was registered under No.AP07AB8999. The 2nd opposite party promised the complainant prompt service through 1st opposite party. The complainant submitted that after running 4 to 5 thousand KMs, there was deterioration in Engine oil position resulting in emission of huge and heavy smoke through silencer besides jerk of the vehicle. At the time of giving the vehicle for 1st service to the 1st opposite party the complainant noticed fall in Engine oil level by liter and the concerned authorities also noticed the emission of heavy smoke from the silencer while...

Mr.K.V.S.Suryanarayana Vs. Icici Direct Icici Web Trade Limited

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

(Sri K. Satyanand,Honble Member) This is an appeal filed by the unsuccessful complainant assailing the order of the District Forum. The facts that led to filing this appeal are briefly as follows: The complainant stated that in the year 2002 he opened account in his wifes name with the opposite party for online trading in shares etc., The complainant intended to place an order for purchase of 2000 shares of that company at 0.72 paise per share but the website of the opposite party indicated that no trading was permitted in this scrip. The complainant therefore sent a letter dated 1-3-2005 through email to the opposite party that such withdrawal of the company from the stock list is not correct and asked them to restore the same. The opposite party responded on 2-3-2006 stating that they have a Risk and Evaluation Committee which looks into their list of companies to be traded and decide whether to include or exclude from the stock list. SRG Infotech was marked as such a company where n...

Smt.P.Bhavani Vs. Principal Chief Post Master General, A.P. Circle and ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

(Sri K. Satyanand,Honble Member) This is an appeal filed by the unsuccessful complainant before the District Forum assailing the order of the District Forum that dismissed her complaint. The facts of the case are briefly as follows: The complainant is the wife of late N.Premanandam, who expired on 23-6-2005 while working as Sub Post Master, Poosaparti Rega (SO) Vizianagaram District. He got his life insured till the age of 60 years for an assured sum of Rs.5,00,000/- with the opposite parties and paid the first premium of Rs.2,475/- on 8-5-2005 which was received by the field office of PLI Vizianagaram on the same day. The 2nd opposite party issued a letter dated 6-7-2005 stating that the insurance was accepted on 9-5-2005. After the death of her husband on 23-6-2005, the complainant made an application to the respondents and the second respondent by letter dated 4-9-2006 regretted the death of the insured and stated that the proponent expired on 23-6-2005 before acceptance of the pro...

Ms. Anjoo Sharma Vs. the Branch Manager Hongkong and Shanghai Banking ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order: (Per Honble Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) This is a complaint filed against HSBC Bank to direct the opposite party to follow the loan repayment schedule, and not to collect higher rate of interest and amount towards EMI, and pay compensation and costs. 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that she had taken a mortgage loan of Rs. 25 lakhs on 25.9.2006 payable in 10 years with an EMI at Rs. 34,792/- stipulating rate of interest at 11.25% floating. The bank has been collecting interest from her savings bank account with the same bank on 15th of every month. She found from the mortgage loan statement that instead of principal amount in the EMI getting increased it was interest component which was being increased abnormally. When she contacted she was informed that rate of interests have gone up and the same being charged at Rs. 15.75%. The statement sent on 31.1.2009 revealed that the rate of interest was changed six times in 22 months from 10/2006 to 8/2008. This ...

icici Home Finance Ltd., Rep. by Its Branch Manager and Another Vs. Sm ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order (Per Smt M.Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.209/2005 on the file of District Forum-II, Krishna at Vijayawada, the opposite parties preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the husband of the complainant submitted an application for sanction of the housing loan for purchase of a flat with the first opposite party who sanctioned Rs.5 lakhs towards housing loan vide letter dt.24.3.2003 and as per the terms and conditions of the said loan it should be repayable by the borrower in 240 equal monthly instalments @ Rs.4,743/- and the future principal outstanding of the loan is extended to cover 12 monthly instalments in case of borrower suffers any disease. The complainants husband paid the instalments regularly to the opposite party for some period and suffered heart problem from December 2003 and subsequently died. This incidence was informed to the first opposite party but her claim was not settled on the ground that the...

Somisetty Venkata Balakrishna Vs. the Vijaya Vasava Motors, Rep. by It ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order (Per Smt M.Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order dt.30.1.2006 in C.C.No.228/2005 on the file of District Forum , West Godavari , Eluru , the complainant preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant purchased Bajaj Saffire Scooter from the opposite party no.1 on 20.1.2001 for a consideration of Rs.32,000/- and it was delivered to him on the same day itself. The vehicle functioned well upto three services and later it started giving some mechanical trouble i.e. the self starter stopped functioning in a proper manner and when the said trouble was complained to the first opposite party they could not rectify the defect and in turn stated that there was some technical defect and the same was intimated to the second opposite party who have deputed one technical engineer, but he also could not rectify it and finally he stated that there was some manufacturing defect in the said vehicle itself. As there was no response from t...

Ex.Servicemen Contributory Health Scheme (Echs) Regional Centre and Ot ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

(Sri K. Satyanand,Honble Member) This is an appeal filed by the opposite parties assailing the order of the District Forum and holding them liable to pay an amount of Rs.50,000/- as compensation and costs of Rs.2,000/-. The facts that led to filing this appeal are briefly are as follows: The complainant, Mrs.N.Shyamala Devi, W/o.Ex.Servicemen N.Surya Prakash jointed the Ex Servicemen Contributory Health Scheme (ECHS by short) by paying a sum of Rs.8,400/- so as to avail comprehensive and quality medicare to be provided by military hospitals and their empanelled civil hospitals. The complainant being the wife of the ex-servicemen was eligible for the benefits of the scheme. The complainant was suffering from pain in abdomen, dysmenorrheal, P/V bleeding since 4-5 months and had consulted Sri Swarna hospital, Proddatur and the consultant doctor there opined that surgery was required at an early date. Thereupon the complainant approached opposite party no.3 the ECHS polyclinic, Giddalur wh...