Advanced Search Results
Ezhilarasu vs the Tahsildar
Chennai
Jun-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Ezhilarasu ..Petitioner(s) Vs2. Head Surveyor,..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBalakrishnan Vs The Tahsildar
Chennai
Jun-05-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Balakrishnan S/o Late Varadhan No 1205 / 2, M.G.R.Nagar, Paramanandal Village & Post, Paramanadal Village & Post, Chengam Taluk 606 710 Tiruvannamalai...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSridhar, Vs The Tahsildar
Chennai
Apr-28-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-04-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE1. Sridhar, S/o. Jyothi No.29/109, Rajarajan Street, Tiruvannamalai Town Tiruvannamalai District 606 601. Petitioner(s) Vs1. The TahsildarRespondent(s) PRAYER Directing the respondents to consider...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Smt. Darshini Vs. Sri. B.a. Talkheen Ahmed
Karnataka
Jun-20-2022
Land Acquisition
Sri. T.N. Viswanatha
R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE20H DAY OF JUNE, 2022 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA AND THE HON’BLE Mrs. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.5563/2016 (MV-D) C/W...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Sarojamma Vs. the Managing Director, Karnataka State Road Transpo ...
Karnataka
Jan-12-1999
Tenancy
Constitution of India - Article 226
1999(3)KarLJ146
Sri K.R. Kumar, Adv.
ORDER1. This revision petition has been filed by the petitioner-tenant under Section 115 of the CPC against the order dated 5-4-1997 passed in R (R) No. 35 of 1990 on the file of the II Additional...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDoddakka Vs. Assistant Commissioner
Karnataka
Nov-09-1994
Limitation
Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 129(4), 129(6) and 136(2)
ILR1994KAR3453; 1995(1)KarLJ265
K.R. Kumar, Adv.
ORDERBharuka, J.1. Heard. By the impugned order - Annexure-E, the respondent -Assistant Commissioner has set aside the order passed by the Revenue inspector, Kora Hobli in MR. 25/89-90 by which the kath'a of Sy.No. 151P was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnjinamma and anr. Vs. Puttahariyappa and ors.
Karnataka
Sep-25-2002
Civil
Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 77 and 77(1); Registration Rules
2003(1)KarLJ441
K.R. Kumar, Adv.
ORDERV. Gopala Gowda, J.1. Though the matter is listed in the preliminary hearing, having regard to the nature of relief prayed for in this petition, by the consent of the learned Counsels for the parties, petitioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHanumantha Rao Kulkarni Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.
Karnataka
Feb-27-2007
Service
Karnataka Law Officers (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1977 - Rules 5(1), 5(2), 5(3), 5(6), 26, 26(2) and 26(3)
2009(2)KarLJ543; 2008(3)KCCR1821; 2008(5)AIRKarR382(DB)
K.R. Kumar, Adv.
Cyriac Joseph, C.J.1. The appellant is the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 11230 of 2006 which was dismissed by the learned Single Judge.2. The appellant was appointed as Additional Government Pleader at Yadgiri in Gulbarga District...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskExcise Commissioner and anr. Vs. Mysore Sales International Ltd. and o ...
Karnataka
Mar-13-2006
Direct Taxation
(2006)203CTR(Kar)505
P. G. Chengappa & E.R. Indrakumar, for the Revenue K.R. Kumar & Sarangan with Dr. R.B. Krishna, for the Assessees
V. Gopala Gowda, J.The appellants Mysore Sales International Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'MSIL' in short) and the Mysore Sugar Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'MSCL' in short) and the State Government represented by its...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMysore Sugar Co. Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit (Tds)-i
Karnataka
Mar-13-2006
Direct Taxation
[2006]154TAXMAN447(Kar)
K.R. Kumar P.G. Chengappa, Sarangan, Dr. R.B. Krishna & E.R. Indrakumar, for the Appearing Parties.
The appellants Mysore Sales International Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'M.S.I.L) and The Mysore Sugar Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'M.S.C.L') and the State Government represented by its Excise Commissioner, Karnataka, have filed these Appeals...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »