Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Balakrishnan Vs The Tahsildar

Balakrishnan vs The Tahsildar

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jun 05, 2026
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1441229

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/18582/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Balakrishnan

Respondent

The Tahsildar

Excerpt

.....within a period of eight weeks.4. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the official respondents.5. in view of the same, the 1 st & 2nd respondents are directed to considerthe petitioners representation dated 04.04.2026 and complete the survey and issue separate patta to the petitioner. in the event if any assistance is sought for page2 of 4by the officials, the concerned jurisdictional police is directed to provide police protection to survey and demarcating the properties by laying survey stones. it is made clear that in the event if the possession of the property is disputed after the survey and laying survey stones, the officials shall not indulge in any way for taking over the possession of the properties and the same can be carried out by following the due process of law i.e., by approaching the civil court for recovery of possession. the 1st & 2nd respondents are directed to complete the said exercise within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.6. this writ petition is disposed of with the above terms. no costs. index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no kkn page3 of 4krishnan ramasamy, j.kkn to page4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 05-06-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Balakrishnan S/o Late Varadhan No 1205 / 2, M.G.R.Nagar, Paramanandal Village & Post, Paramanadal Village & Post, Chengam Taluk 606 710 Tiruvannamalai District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to consider petitioner’s representation dated 04.04.2026 to measure the property in Survey No.124/1 of an extent of acres 1.04 cents situated in Paramanandhal Village, Chengam Taluk Tiruvannamalai District and to grant a separate patta in favour of the petitioner, his mother and his brother with new sub-division number. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.R.Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Guruprasad Government Counsel

Page1 of 4

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 04.04.2026.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner has given a representation dated 04.04.2026 to measure the subject property situated in Paramanandhal Village, Chengam Taluk Tiruvannamalai District and to grant a separate patta in favour of the petitioner, his mother and his brother with new sub-division number. Since no steps have been taken, the present writ petition is filed.

3. The learned Government Counsel appearing for the Official

respondents would submit that the petitioner’s representation dated 04.04.2026 will be considered and appropriate orders will be passed by the respondents within a period of eight weeks.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the Official respondents.

5. In view of the same, the 1 st & 2nd respondents are directed to consider

the petitioners representation dated 04.04.2026 and complete the survey and issue separate patta to the petitioner. In the event if any assistance is sought for Page2 of 4

by the Officials, the concerned jurisdictional Police is directed to provide Police protection to survey and demarcating the properties by laying survey stones. It is made clear that in the event if the possession of the property is disputed after the survey and laying survey stones, the Officials shall not indulge in any way for taking over the possession of the properties and the same can be carried out by following the due process of law i.e., by approaching the civil Court for recovery of possession. The 1st & 2nd respondents are directed to complete the said exercise within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. This Writ Petition is disposed of with the above terms. No costs. Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No KKN Page3 of 4

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

KKN To Page4 of 4

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties Balakrishnan vs The Tahsildar Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales