Sridhar, Vs The Tahsildar

Sridhar, vs The Tahsildar

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Apr 28, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1437958

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1437958
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose
Decided On: Apr 28, 2026
Case Number: WP/14998/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sridhar,

Respondent

The Tahsildar

Excerpt

.....notice on behalf of the respondents.4. this court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation.5. no prejudice will be caused to the respondents if the said authoritiesare directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner’s property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections if any from the neighbouring land owners as well as any other party, whom they deem it fit to enquire. accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-(a) before surveying the lands in question, the respondents are directed to issue notice to the neighbouring land owners, and also to any other party, whom they deem it fit to enquire.(b) after receiving objections if any and afterconsidering the same, the respondents shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. no costs. index:yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderinternet:yes neutral citation:yes/no ab to 1.the tahsildar abdul quddhose j. ab

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28-04-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

1. Sridhar, S/o. Jyothi No.29/109, Rajarajan Street, Tiruvannamalai Town Tiruvannamalai District 606 601. Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The Tahsildar

Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the respondents to consider petitioners Representation dated 28.03.2026 to measure the property in Survey No.113 / 9C of an extent of 0.19 cents situated in Adi Annamalai Village, Tiruvannamalai Taluk and District For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.R.Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Govt.Advocate

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, based on his representation dated 28.03.2026 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2. The petitioner had submitted an application through on-line on 28.03.2026 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

3. Mr. R. P. Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

4. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation.

5. No prejudice will be caused to the respondents if the said authorities

are directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner’s property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections if any from the neighbouring land owners as well as any other party, whom they deem it fit to enquire. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-

(a) Before surveying the lands in question, the respondents are directed to issue notice to the neighbouring land owners, and also to any other party, whom they deem it fit to enquire.

(b) After receiving objections if any and after

considering the same, the respondents shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No Costs. Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ab To 1.The Tahsildar ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties Sridhar, vs The Tahsildar Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose