Ezhilarasu vs the Tahsildar

Ezhilarasu vs The Tahsildar

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jun 02, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1441251

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1441251
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy
Decided On: Jun 02, 2026
Case Number: WP/16317/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ezhilarasu

Respondent

The Tahsildar

Excerpt

.....district. however, the same was not considered, as on date. hence, this writ petition.3. mr.b.pachaiyappan, learned government’s counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and submitted that the petitioner’s representation dated 02.04.2026 will be considered within a period of eight weeks.4. heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.5. considering the limited relief sought by the learned counsel for thepetitioner, this court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 02.04.2026 and carry out a survey and complete the process, after giving prior notice to the petitioner and other aggrieved parties, if any, within a period ofeight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this orderpage2 of 46. it is made clear that this order is passed only for the purpose of issuinga direction to the official respondents to conduct a survey in the subject land. in the event any dispute arises regarding the possession of the subject property, the same has to be decided by way of filing a suit before the competent civil court.7. with the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. no costs. index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no vm to:2. head surveyor page3 of 4krishnan ramasamy, j.vm page4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02-06-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Ezhilarasu ..Petitioner(s) Vs
2. Head Surveyor,
..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider petitioner’s representation dated 02.04.2026 to measure the property in Survey Village, Chengam Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.R.Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Government’s Counsel

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 02.04.2026. Page1 of 4

2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner has made a representation dated 02.04.2026 to measure his properties in Survey Village, Chengam Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. However, the same was not considered, as on date. Hence, this writ petition.

3. Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government’s Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and submitted that the petitioner’s representation dated 02.04.2026 will be considered within a period of eight weeks.

4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

5. Considering the limited relief sought by the learned counsel for the

petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 02.04.2026 and carry out a survey and complete the process, after giving prior notice to the petitioner and other aggrieved parties, if any, within a period of

eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order

Page2 of 4

6. It is made clear that this order is passed only for the purpose of issuing

a direction to the official respondents to conduct a survey in the subject land. In the event any dispute arises regarding the possession of the subject property, the same has to be decided by way of filing a suit before the competent Civil Court.

7. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No VM To:

2. Head Surveyor Page3 of 4

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

VM Page4 of 4

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties Ezhilarasu vs The Tahsildar Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy