Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: petitioner · Respondent: respondent · Page 1 of about 174 results (0.032 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 14 2016

Petitioner Vs. Respondent

Court : Kerala

Appellant : Petitioner

Respondent : Respondent

Decided on : Apr-14-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J. 1. These matters are listed today following the order dated 12.4.2016. 2. Two issues are focused for consideration on the basis of the submissions made by the learned Advocate General. The first...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 03 2016

Petitioner Vs. Respondent

Court : Chennai

Appellant : Petitioner

Respondent : Respondent

Decided on : Nov-03-2016

Subject : Miscellaneous

M. Venugopal, J. 1. Notice through Court was sent by the Registry for the hearing on 01.11.2016. For ascertaining as to whether the Court Notice was served on the Respondents, this Court directs the Judicial Magistrate,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2016

Petitioner Vs. Respondent

Court : Chennai Madurai

Appellant : Petitioner

Respondent : Respondent

Decided on : Aug-11-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

Nooty. Ramamohana Rao,J. 1. It is appropriate to notice that while entertaining W.P.Nos.8959 and 9025 of 1999, the Learned Single Judge, by his order dated 04.08.2008 allowed the writ petitions and quashed the impugned order of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 15 2016

Petitioner Vs. Respondent

Court : Chennai

Appellant : Petitioner

Respondent : Respondent

Decided on : Sep-15-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

M. Venugopal, J. 1. It comes to be known that the Learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai had addressed a letter in Dis.No.971 of 2016 dated 29.08.2016, to the Registrar General of this Court, inter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 22 2016

Petitioner Vs. Respondent

Court : Chennai Madurai

Appellant : Petitioner

Respondent : Respondent

Decided on : Jun-22-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. Order on maintainability. These appeals together with Special Leave Petitions have been preferred by the Public Prosecutor for the State as against order of acquittal passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur in C.C.Nos.82 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 2016

Petitioner Vs. Respondent

Court : Chennai

Appellant : Petitioner

Respondent : Respondent

Decided on : Mar-15-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. Heard both sides. 2. Leave has been sought for under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C to appeal as against the order of acquittal passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Perambalur in S.C.No.46 of 2014....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 2012

Petitioner Vs. Respondent

Court : Chennai

Appellant : Petitioner

Respondent : Respondent

Decided on : Sep-14-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

K. Chandru, J. 1. This application is filed by the applicants seeking for an interim injunction restraining the defendants in any way making or publishing any further false, intimidatory and defamatory allegations against the plaintiffs. 2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 2016

Petitioner Vs. Respondent

Court : Chennai

Appellant : Petitioner

Respondent : Respondent

Decided on : Oct-17-2016

Subject : Right to Information

N. Kirubakaran, J. 1. Since the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeals have been pending before this Court as Part-Heard matters, affidavits dated 13.10.2016, 13.10.2016, 14.10.2016, 14.10.2016, 17.10.2016 have been filed stating that 450 buses of the Tamil...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 22 2016

Petitioner Vs. Respondent

Court : Chennai Madurai

Appellant : Petitioner

Respondent : Respondent

Decided on : Jul-22-2016

Subject : Criminal

1. The Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal is admitted on the following substantial questions of law: 2. Whether all the incidents and cruelty rendered by the Respondent should be narrated in the notice itself? 3. Whether the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 10 2016

Petitioner Vs. Respondent

Court : Chennai Madurai

Appellant : Petitioner

Respondent : Respondent

Decided on : Jun-10-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

Common Order Sanjay Kishan Kaul, C.J. 1. It is stated that connected matters (WA.(MD).Nos.933 and 934 of 2016) are listed on 13.06.2016. However, the learned counsel who are to make submissions in these matters, seek that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial