Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Petitioner Vs. Respondent

Petitioner vs Respondent

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Nov 03, 2016
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1187481

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.O.P. No. 20517 of 2016 In Crl.A.Sr. No. 38726 of 2016
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Petitioner

Respondent

Respondent

Excerpt

m. venugopal, j. 1. notice through court was sent by the registry for the hearing on 01.11.2016. for ascertaining as to whether the court notice was served on the respondents, this court directs the judicial magistrate, udhagamandalam to submit a report in this regard to the registrar (judicial) of this court on or before 08.11.2016. 2. soon after receipt of the report from the judicial magistrate, udhagamandalam, the registry is directed to list the matter.

Full Judgment

M. Venugopal, J.

1. Notice through Court was sent by the Registry for the hearing on 01.11.2016. For ascertaining as to whether the Court Notice was served on the Respondents, this Court directs the Judicial Magistrate, Udhagamandalam to submit a Report in this regard to the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court on or before 08.11.2016.

2. Soon after receipt of the Report from the Judicial Magistrate, Udhagamandalam, the Registry is directed to list the matter.

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2016 Same Parties Petitioner vs Respondent Same Subject Miscellaneous Same Judge M. Venugopal
Miscellaneous

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales