Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Petitioner Vs. Respondent

Petitioner vs Respondent

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Jun 10, 2016
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1190622

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
W.P.(MD).Nos. 10252 & 10253 to 10256 of 2016
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Petitioner

Respondent

Respondent

Excerpt

common order sanjay kishan kaul, c.j. 1. it is stated that connected matters (wa.(md).nos.933 and 934 of 2016) are listed on 13.06.2016. however, the learned counsel who are to make submissions in these matters, seek that these matters may be taken up on 16.06.2016 and those matters are to be adjourned to 16.06.2016. 2. mr.t.s.mohammed mohideen, learned additional government pleader accepts notice for r.2 and mr.m.alagadevan, learned special government pleader accepts notice for r.1and3. 3. the second respondent is directed to be present before this court on 16.06.2016. post the matter on 16.06.2016.

Full Judgment

Common Order

Sanjay Kishan Kaul, C.J.

1. It is stated that connected matters (WA.(MD).Nos.933 and 934 of 2016) are listed on 13.06.2016. However, the learned counsel who are to make submissions in these matters, seek that these matters may be taken up on 16.06.2016 and those matters are to be adjourned to 16.06.2016.

2. Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen, learned Additional Government Pleader accepts notice for R.2 and Mr.M.Alagadevan, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice for R.1and3.

3. The second respondent is directed to be present before this Court on 16.06.2016. Post the matter on 16.06.2016.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial