Citation network
Tennessee Vs. Davis
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1879
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 257 (1879) U.S. Supreme Court Tennessee v. DavisSearch
-
U.S. 257 (1879) Tennessee v. DavisSearch
-
answer may depend the possibility of the general government's preserving its own existence. As was said in Martin v. HunterSearch
-
This provision embraces alike civil and criminal cases arising under the Constitution and laws. Cohens v. VirginiaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Wheat. 19 U. S. 379 . It was said in Osborn v. TheSearch
-
Constitution, sec. 1745, or an indirect mode of exercising original jurisdiction, as intimated in Railway Company v. WhittonSearch
-
or treaties. The subject has more than once been before this Court, and it has been fully considered. In Martin v. HunterSearch
-
was ruled that it does thus act. The expression must be read in its Page 100 U. S. 270 connection. In Martin v. HunterSearch
-
certainly seems more an invasion of state jurisdiction than a removal before trial. The case was followed by Cohens v. VirginiaSearch
-
or after trial, and neither case made any distinction between civil and criminal proceedings. In The Mayor v. CooperSearch
-
Com. v. AshmunSearch
-
State v. HoskinsSearch
-
indictment, before any federal tribunal can determine the guilt or innocence of the supposed offender. United States v. HudsonSearch
-
United States v. CoolidgeSearch
-
the high seas or in any river, haven, basin, or bay out of the jurisdiction of any particular state. United States v. BevansSearch
-
the jurisdiction of the state, Congress has not given cognizance of the offense to the circuit courts. United States v. WiltbergerSearch
-
in a riot, assault, or murder, and may subject the same person to the punishment prescribed by the state laws. Moore v. IllinoisSearch
-
and independently of each other as if the line of division was traced by landmarks visible to the eye. Ableman v. BoothSearch
-
forum in bar to an indictment in the other, as the act committed was an offense against the authority of each. Fox v. TheSearch
-
and that it may draw to its commission the penalties denounced by each for the commission of the act. United States v. AmySearch
-
Court of the District of Massachusetts, and the case was remanded with a certificate to that effect. United States v. BevansSearch
-
the punishment to be imposed and specifies the court that shall have jurisdiction of the offense. United States v. WiltbergerSearch
-
Same v. SameSearch
-
for counterfeiting state bank issues, or for robbing express companies established by state authority. United States v. WardSearch
-
except when authorized by an act of Congress, passed in pursuance of the Constitution. State of Pennsylvania v. WheelingSearch
-
United States v. WorralSearch
-
respect to such cases pending in those tribunals is confined to certificates of division of opinion. United States v. MoreSearch
-
court of the state, sue out a writ of error and remove the cause into the Supreme Court for reexamination. Murdock v. MemphisSearch
-
but the other provision, when the proper case is presented, extends to criminal as well as civil cases. Twitchell v. TheSearch
-
set up depends on the construction of the Constitution, an act of Congress, or some constitutional treaty. Williams v. NorrisSearch
-
in two important cases reported in the volumes containing the decisions of the Supreme Court of that period. Martin v. Hunter'sSearch
-
only be exercised by the Supreme Court in such cases and to such extent as the acts of Congress authorize. Wiscart v. DauchySearch
-
the jurisdiction may be exercised implies a negative on the exercise of such power in all other cases. Durousseau v. TheSearch
-
United States v. MoreSearch
-
Martin v. Hunter'sSearch
-
July 13, 1866, repealed that section altogether, subject to a proviso inapplicable to the present case. Philadelphia v. CollectorSearch
-
Page 100 U. S. 293 Hornthall v. CollectorSearch
-
Assessors v. OsborneSearch
-
under the Constitution, the laws of Congress, or treaties made or which shall be made under their authority. Com. v. CaseySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial