Same V Same - Judgment Search Results
N. V. Builders Vs. V.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1363 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision:1. 3.2013 N.V.Builders .Petitioner v. Vijay N. Zade and another .Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr.Ashish Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner(s).Mr.V.Ramswaroop,
V. Vs. George V. Commissioner of Agrl. Income Tax.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jun-27-1984
Reported in: (1985)45CTR(Ker)142
27-7-1968. It was an assessee to Agricultural IT on the files of the 2nd respondent - Agrl. ITO, Vythiri. It is alleged that the firm was dissolved by a Deed of Dissolution dt. 2-6-1980 (Ext. P11). After
V. Vs. S. Natarajan V. Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-1977
Reported in: [1978]111ITR539(Mad)
not allotted any property ?'The assessee was being assessed as a Hindu undivided family. It consists of one V. V. S. Pandurangan, who is the karta, his wife, Rajeswari, and their two minor daughters, Ponmathi and Leela.
18-section briefs on any result in this list
V. Vs. Rama Rao Naidu V. Commissioner of Income-tax, Hyderabad, and Ot ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-12-1960
Reported in: [1961]42ITR80(AP)
J. - The common question which falls for determination in these writ petitions is whether the Income-tax Officer, Vizianagaram Circle, was right in treating the petitioner as the legal representative of his mother Mahalakshmamma, and in that
V. Vs. R. N. Vr. Nagappa Chettiar V. Income-tax Officer, Karaikudi, an ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-12-1957
Reported in: [1958]33ITR226(Mad)
by the petitioner and assessed for the years 1939-40, 1940-41 and 1941-42.The point that is raised is a very short one, and the question is whether the certificates issued under section 46(2) of the Income-tax Act in
V vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 980/2026 V .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Anushkaa Arora, Adv. (DHCLSC) with Ms. Anchal Yadav, Adv.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through:
V vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-20-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1622/2026, CRL.M.A. 16231/2026 V ...Petitioner Through: Ms. Pallavi Garg (DHCLSC) and Ms. Sanjana Sharma Sahu, Advs.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI ...Respondent Through:
*** Vs. V.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-06-2013
HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.7554 of 2013 Date of decision : May 06, 2013 Gurnam Singh Lali, .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab and otheRs......Respondents *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr.Sandeep Arora, Advocate
*** Vs. V.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
1997 (O&M) Date of decision : August 30, 2013 Haryana State Co-op Supply & Marketing Federation Limited, .....Petitioner v. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Hisar & another, .....Respondent *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present
*** Vs. V.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-16-2013
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : January 16, 2013 Dr. Kiran Sharma .....Petitioner v. U.T.Chandigarh Administration .....Respondent *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH *** Present : Mr.Vineet Sehgal, Advocate, for the
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free