Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Clarke Vs. Bazadone

Clarke vs Bazadone

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1803
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/78287

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
5 U.S. 212
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Clarke

Respondent

Bazadone

Excerpt

clarke v. bazadone - 5 u.s. 212 (1803) u.s. supreme court clarke v. bazadone, 5 u.s. 1 cranch 212 212 (1803) clarke v. bazadone 5 u.s. (1 cranch) 212 error to the general court of the territory northwest of the river ohio syllabus a writ of error does not lie from this court to the general court of the territory northwest of the ohio. this court was established by an ordinance of the colonial congress, during the confederation. the only question decided in the case was whether the writ of error would lie. the writ of error was quashed on the ground that the act of congress establishing the territory had not authorized an appeal or writ of error to the supreme court of the united states.

Full Judgment

Clarke v. Bazadone - 5 U.S. 212 (1803)
U.S. Supreme Court Clarke v. Bazadone, 5 U.S. 1 Cranch 212 212 (1803)

Clarke v. Bazadone

5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 212

ERROR TO THE GENERAL COURT OF THE

TERRITORY NORTHWEST OF THE RIVER OHIO

SYLLABUS

A writ of error does not lie from this Court to the general court of the territory northwest of the Ohio.

This Court was established by an ordinance of the colonial Congress, during the confederation. The only question decided in the case was whether the writ of error would lie.

The writ of error was quashed on the ground that the act of Congress establishing the territory had not authorized an appeal or writ of error to the Supreme Court of the United States.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial