Citation network
Procunier Vs. Navarette
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 22, 1978
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 555 (1978) U.S. Supreme Court Procunier v. NavaretteSearch
-
U.S. 555 (1978) Procunier v. NavaretteSearch
-
to cause a deprivation of constitutional rights or other injury to respondent. Wood v. StricklandSearch
-
The Court of Appeals reversed as to the first three claims. Navarette v. EnomotoSearch
-
and prosecutors, but that they were entitled to the qualified immunity accorded those officials involved in Scheuer v. RhodesSearch
-
U. S. 232 (1974), and Wood v. StricklandSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
to a state Governor, a president of a state university, and officers and members of a state National Guard. Scheuer v. RhodesSearch
-
supra. The same is true of local school board members, Wood v. StricklandSearch
-
of the superintendent of a state hospital, O'Connor v. DonaldsonSearch
-
and of policemen, Pierson v. RaySearch
-
Imbler v. PachtmanSearch
-
damages suit, and could rely only on the qualified immunity described in Scheuer v. RhodesSearch
-
supra, and Wood v. StricklandSearch
-
U.S. at 416 U. S. 247 -248. We further held in Wood v. StricklandSearch
-
U.S. at 420 U. S. 322 . Under the first part of the Wood v. StricklandSearch
-
the Court of Appeals relied on two of its own decisions, one in 1973 and the other in 1974, as well as upon Martinez v. ProcunierSearch
-
in essential agreement. The court relied on no earlier opinions, and this Court, in affirming the judgment in Martinez v. ProcunierSearch
-
a prisoner's correspondence were involved when prison officials interfered with a prisoner's outgoing mail. Procunier v. MartinezSearch
-
Respondent relies on Hyland v. ProcunierSearch
-
Gilmore v. LynchSearch
-
F.Supp. 105 (ND Cal.1970), aff'd sub nom. Younger v. GilmoreSearch
-
Northern v. NelsonSearch
-
Payne v. WhitmoreSearch
-
and Brenneman v. MadiganSearch
-
U. S. 566 Neither should petitioners' immunity defense be overruled under the second branch of the Wood v. StricklandSearch
-
Whether deliberate refusal to mail certain of a prisoner's correspondence in 1971-1972 prior to Procunier v. MartinezSearch
-
our power to decide is not limited by the precise terms of the question presented. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. UniversitySearch
-
E.g., Knell v. BensingerSearch
-
Hoitt v. VitekSearch
-
Dewell v. LawsonSearch
-
Anderson v. NosserSearch
-
Bryan v. JonesSearch
-
U.S. at 416 U. S. 406 , citing McCloskey v. MarylandSearch
-
Lee v. TahashSearch
-
Krupnick v. CrouseSearch
-
U.S. at 416 U. S. 406 -407, citing, inter alia, Sostre v. McGinnisSearch
-
Jackson v. GodwinSearch
-
Wilkinson v. SkinnerSearch
-
particularly with respect to inmate mail. Jurisdictional Statement filed in Procunier v. MartinezSearch
-
In Hyland v. ProcunierSearch
-
advance permission for speeches to public gatherings. The opinion did not discuss the rights of prisoners. Gilmore v. LynchSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial