Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pope Vs. Daggett

Pope vs Daggett

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Apr-18-1966
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101415

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
384 U.S. 33
Subject
Direct Taxation

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Direct Taxation

Key legal issue
Direct Taxation

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pope

Respondent

Daggett

Excerpt

pope v. daggett - 384 u.s. 33 (1966) u.s. supreme court pope v. daggett, 384 u.s. 33 (1966) 384 u.s. 33 pope v. daggett et al. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the tenth circuit. no. 837, misc. decided april 18, 1966. certiorari granted; 350 f.2d 296 , vacated and remanded to district court with instructions to dismiss as moot. petitioner pro se. solicitor general marshall, assistant attorney general doar and david l. norman for respondents. per curiam. upon consideration of the representations of the solicitor general that the relief petitioner seeks is presently available due to changes in the applicable prison regulations and upon an examination of all of the papers submitted, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the united states district court for the district of kansas with instructions to dismiss as moot. page 384 u.s. 33, 34

Full Judgment

POPE v. DAGGETT - 384 U.S. 33 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court POPE v. DAGGETT, 384 U.S. 33 (1966) 384 U.S. 33

POPE v. DAGGETT ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 837, Misc.
Decided April 18, 1966.

Certiorari granted; 350 F.2d 296 , vacated and remanded to District Court with instructions to dismiss as moot.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Doar and David L. Norman for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the representations of the Solicitor General that the relief petitioner seeks is presently available due to changes in the applicable prison regulations and upon an examination of all of the papers submitted, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the District of Kansas with instructions to dismiss as moot.

Page 384 U.S. 33, 34



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial