Younger Vs. Gilmore

Younger vs Gilmore

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Nov-08-1971

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102759

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/102759
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Nov-08-1971
Case Number: 404 U.S. 15
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Younger

Respondent

Gilmore

Excerpt

younger v. gilmore - 404 u.s. 15 (1971) u.s. supreme court younger v. gilmore, 404 u.s. 15 (1971) 404 u.s. 15 younger, attorney general of california, et al. v. gilmore et al. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of california no. 70-9. argued october 14, 1971 decided november 8, 1971 319 f. supp. 105, affirmed. george r. nock, deputy attorney general of california, argued the cause for appellants. with him on the briefs were evelle j. younger, attorney general, pro se, albert w. harris, jr., assistant attorney general, and robert r. granucci, deputy attorney general. john eshleman wahl, by appointment of the court, post, p. 814, argued the cause for appellees. with him on the brief was marshall w. krause. jack greenberg, james m. nabrit iii, charles stephen ralston, stanley a. bass, anthony g. amsterdam, william bennett turner, and alice daniel filed a brief for the naacp legal defense and educational fund, inc., et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance. per curiam. on this appeal we postponed the question of jurisdiction pending the hearing of the case on the merits. 401 u.s. 906 (1971). having heard the case on its merits, we find that this court does have jurisdiction (alabama teachers v. alabama public school and college authority, 393 u.s. 400 (1969)) and affirm the judgment of the district court for the northern district of california. johnson v. avery, 393 u.s. 483 (1969). page 404 u.s. 15, 16

Full Judgment

YOUNGER v. GILMORE - 404 U.S. 15 (1971)
U.S. Supreme Court YOUNGER v. GILMORE, 404 U.S. 15 (1971) 404 U.S. 15

YOUNGER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. v. GILMORE ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA
No. 70-9.

Argued October 14, 1971
Decided November 8, 1971

319 F. Supp. 105, affirmed.

George R. Nock, Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General, pro se, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Robert R. Granucci, Deputy Attorney General.

John Eshleman Wahl, by appointment of the Court, post, p. 814, argued the cause for appellees. With him on the brief was Marshall W. Krause.

Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Charles Stephen Ralston, Stanley A. Bass, Anthony G. Amsterdam, William Bennett Turner, and Alice Daniel filed a brief for the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance.

PER CURIAM.

On this appeal we postponed the question of jurisdiction pending the hearing of the case on the merits. 401 U.S. 906 (1971).

Having heard the case on its merits, we find that this Court does have jurisdiction (Alabama Teachers v. Alabama Public School and College Authority, 393 U.S. 400 (1969)) and affirm the judgment of the District Court for the Northern District of California. Johnson v. Avery, 393 U.S. 483 (1969).

Page 404 U.S. 15, 16

Same Court & Year US Supreme Court · 1971 Same Parties Younger vs Gilmore Same Subject Education

Education attorney general district court public school supreme court per curiam