Citation network
Cruz Vs. Hauck
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 16, 1971
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 59 (1971) U.S. Supreme Court Cruz v. HauckSearch
-
U.S. 59 (1971) Cruz v. HauckSearch
-
is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of Younger v. GilmoreSearch
-
I We have held, in line with Griffin v. IllinoisSearch
-
a direct criminal appeal or of state habeas relief solely on account of his inability to prepay docketing fees. Smith v. BennettSearch
-
suggests that a substantial argument could be presented. For a discussion of the procedures employed, see Coppedge v. UnitedSearch
-
Hardy v. UnitedSearch
-
In Eskridge v. WashingtonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
a trial judge believed his own conduct had avoided the production of nonfrivolous questions for review. See also Ross v. SchnecklothSearch
-
U. S. 575 (1958). In Lane v. BrownSearch
-
hearing could not be thwarted simply because a public defender officer believed his case lacked merit. In Ellis v. UnitedSearch
-
a Court of Appeals may not overrule the permission granted by a District Court to proceed in forma pauperis, McGann v. UnitedSearch
-
of Appeals must review de novo a trial judge's certification that an appeal would not be in good faith, Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
See Williams v. ShaferSearch
-
U. S. 1037 , 1039 (1967). Indeed, last Term, in Boddie v. ConnecticutSearch
-
appeals, condemning filing fees substantially less burdensome than those required below by the Fifth Circuit. See Long v. DistrictSearch
-
Court of Iowa, 385 U. S. 192 (1966), and Smith v. BennettSearch
-
expansion of Griffin to non-habeas civil appeals. In a civil rights case similar to the instant one, Lockhart v. D'UrsoSearch
-
In my view, the decision in Boddie v. ConnecticutSearch
-
Meltzer v. PageSearch
-
has the effect of classifying appellants according to wealth, which, like race, is a suspect classification. Griffin v. IllinoisSearch
-
Harper v. VirginiaSearch
-
Bd. of Elections, 383 U. S. 663 (1966). See also Shapiro v. ThompsonSearch
-
The issue at stake in the appeal was clearly not frivolous, as indicated by our decision in Younger v. GilmoreSearch
-
this Court has reversed lower courts' holdings that only frivolous claims were sought to be presented. Rubio v. UnitedSearch
-
Robinson v. UnitedSearch
-
Jones v. UnitedSearch
-
Gilliam v. UnitedSearch
-
Garrett v. UnitedSearch
-
Kemp v. UnitedSearch
-
Coppedge v. UnitedSearch
-
Roberts v. LaValleeSearch
-
Long v. DistrictSearch
-
concept of equal protection of the laws is incorporated into the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Bolling v. SharpeSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Cruz v. HauckSearch
-
of Younger v. GilmoreSearch
-
Griffin v. IllinoisSearch
-
In Lane v. BrownSearch
-
In Ellis v. UnitedSearch
-
McGann v. UnitedSearch
-
Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
the Fifth Circuit. See Long v. DistrictSearch
-
and Smith v. BennettSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial