Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ross Vs. Schneckloth

Ross vs Schneckloth

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-30-1958
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99385

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
357 U.S. 575
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ross

Respondent

Schneckloth

Excerpt

ross v. schneckloth - 357 u.s. 575 (1958) u.s. supreme court ross v. schneckloth, 357 u.s. 575 (1958) 357 u.s. 575 ross v. schneckloth, superintendent, washington state penitentiary. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of washington. no. 513, misc. decided june 30, 1958. * certiorari granted; judgments vacated; and cases remanded for consideration in the light of eskridge v. washington state prison board, ante, p. 214. reported below: no. 513, misc., 51 wash. 2d 893, 318 p.2d 975. [ footnote * ] together with no. 596, misc., woods v. rhay, superintendent, washington state penitentiary, also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same court. petitioners pro se. john j. o'connell, attorney general of washington, and michael r. alfieri, assistant attorney general, for respondent in no. 596, misc. per curiam. the motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. the judgments of the supreme court of washington are vacated and the cases are remanded for consideration in light of eskridge v. washington state prison board, ante, p. 214. page 357 u.s. 575, 576

Full Judgment

ROSS v. SCHNECKLOTH - 357 U.S. 575 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court ROSS v. SCHNECKLOTH, 357 U.S. 575 (1958) 357 U.S. 575

ROSS v. SCHNECKLOTH, SUPERINTENDENT, WASHINGTON STATE PENITENTIARY.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 513, Misc.
Decided June 30, 1958. *

Certiorari granted; judgments vacated; and cases remanded for consideration in the light of Eskridge v. Washington State Prison Board, ante, p. 214.

Reported below: No. 513, Misc., 51 Wash. 2d 893, 318 P.2d 975.

[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 596, Misc., Woods v. Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary, also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same Court.

Petitioners pro se.

John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Michael R. Alfieri, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent in No. 596, Misc.

PER CURIAM.

The motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments of the Supreme Court of Washington are vacated and the cases are remanded for consideration in light of Eskridge v. Washington State Prison Board, ante, p. 214.

Page 357 U.S. 575, 576



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial