Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bass Vs. United States

Bass vs United States

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jan-26-1959
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99744

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
358 U.S. 333
Subject
FERA

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

FERA

Key legal issue
FERA

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bass

Respondent

United States

Excerpt

bass v. united states - 358 u.s. 333 (1959) u.s. supreme court bass v. united states, 358 u.s. 333 (1959) 358 u.s. 333 bass v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the western district of virginia. no. 528. decided january 26, 1959. 163 f. supp. 1, affirmed. wilbert g. burnette for appellant. solicitor general rankin, assistant attorney general hansen, charles h. weston, w. louise florencourt, robert w. ginnane and carroll t. prince, jr. for the united states and the interstate commerce commission, appellees. linwood c. major, jr. for the atlantic greyhound corporation et al., appellees. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. lanza v. new jersey, 358 u.s. 333 (1959) 358 u.s. 333 (1959) "> u.s. supreme court lanza v. new jersey, 358 u.s. 333 (1959) 358 u.s. 333 lanza v. new jersey. appeal from the supreme court of new jersey. no. 532. decided january 26, 1959. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 27 n. j. 516, 143 a. 2d 571. vito f. lanza for appellant. david d. furman, attorney general of new jersey, and bernard hellring for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 358 u.s. 333, 334

Full Judgment

BASS v. UNITED STATES - 358 U.S. 333 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court BASS v. UNITED STATES, 358 U.S. 333 (1959) 358 U.S. 333

BASS v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT
OF VIRGINIA. No. 528.
Decided January 26, 1959.

163 F. Supp. 1, affirmed.

Wilbert G. Burnette for appellant.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Charles H. Weston, W. Louise Florencourt, Robert W. Ginnane and Carroll T. Prince, Jr. for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees.

Linwood C. Major, Jr. for the Atlantic Greyhound Corporation et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


LANZA v. NEW JERSEY, <a href="/99744"> 358 U.S. 333 </a> (1959) 358 U.S. 333 (1959) "> U.S. Supreme Court LANZA v. NEW JERSEY, 358 U.S. 333 (1959) 358 U.S. 333

LANZA v. NEW JERSEY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 532.
Decided January 26, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 27 N. J. 516, 143 A. 2d 571.

Vito F. Lanza for appellant.

David D. Furman, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Bernard Hellring for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 358 U.S. 333, 334



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial