Advanced Search Results

Central Bureau of Investigation Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : FERA

Acts : Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 3 and 5; Foregin Exchange Regulation Act - Sections 4, 5,8(1), 19A, 25(1), 26, 33(2), 34, 35, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 56, 61, and 62; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 6, 154, 155(2), 188 and 482

Reported in : 1996VAD(SC)471; AIR1996SC2402; 1996(2)ALD(Cri)187; [1997]88CompCas326(SC); 1996CriLJ3480; (2001)1GLR907; JT1996(6)SC314; 1996(5)SCALE203; (1996)9SCC735; [1996]Supp3SCR127

under Section 25(1) read with Section 56 of the Foreign Exchange (Regulation) Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as FERA) against respondent No. 3 Shri Arvind Singh Mewar of Udaipur, Rajasthan. It was inter alia stated in the

Standard Chartered Bank and ors. Vs. Directorate of Enforcement and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : FERA

Acts : Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 50, 51, 52, 54, 56, 56(1), 56(2), 59, 61, 61(2), 63, 64(1), 64(2), 68, 68(1) and 68(2); Companies Act; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 23D; Income Tax Act - Sections 276C; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 40; General Clauses Act - Sections 3(38); Customs Act - Sections 140(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20(3), 21 and 31B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Criminal Law

Reported in : AIR2006SC1301; 2006(1)ALD(Cri)614; II(2006)BC391(SC); 2006(3)BomCR621; (2006)2CALLT42(SC); [2006]130CompCas341(SC); 127(2006)DLT747(SC); 2006(197)ELT18(SC); JT2006(3)SC421; (2006)4SCC278

No. 5892/2004.1. On receipt of notices under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the FERA) for showing cause why adjudication proceedings for imposition of penalty under Sections 50 and 51 of the FERA

Director of Enforcement Vs. M/S. Mctm. Corporation Pvt. Ltd. and Other ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : FERA

Acts : Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 12, 17, 18(A and B) and 23(1); Constitution of India - Articles 20(2) and 226; General Clauses Act, 1897; Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 167(8) and 188

Reported in : 1996IAD(SC)646; AIR1996SC1100; 1996(1)ALD(Cri)777; [1997]88CompCas449(SC); 1996CriLJ1623; 1996(54)ECC41; JT1996(1)SC79; 1996(1)SCALE133; (1996)2SCC471; [1996]1SCR215

contravened the provisions of Section 10(1)(a) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as 'the FERA, 1947'). The gravamen of the departmental case against the respondents was that they had failed to repatriate the

Grindlays Bank P.L.C. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kolkata

Subject : FERA

Acts : Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Section 16, 51, 52 and 81(3); ;Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 4, 5, 9, 10, 10(1), 10(2), 12(2), 17, 18A, 18B, 23 and 23(1); ;Income-tax Act, 1961 - Section 148; ;General Clauses Act - Section 6; ;Adjudicating Proceeding and Appeal Rules, 1974 - Rule 3 and 3(1)

Reported in : [2001]106CompCas1(Cal),2001(76)ECC335,2001(130)ELT419(Cal)

show cause as to why the adjudication under Section 23D of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 (the FERA, 1947), for violation of Section 10(1)(a) of the FERA 1947, due to delay to repatriate the sum of

Vasanthi Nelson Vs. Antony Nelson Alias A.B.H. Nelson, Represented by ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : FERA

Acts : Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(2), 7(1), 31, 31(1), 50, 51 and 68; Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act, 1988 - Sections 3(2); Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 - Sections 6, 6(2), 6(3), 47(2), 49 and 49(3); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947; Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 7, Rule 11, Order 14, Rule 2(5) - Order 40, Rule 1; Foreign Exchange Management (Acquisition and Transfer of Immovable Property in India) Regulations, 2000 - Regulations 4, 5, 6 and 7

Reported in : (2007)2MLJ369

to be paid unreservedly to the defendant or to her order. The plaintiff is a foreigner. As per FERA, a foreigner cannot acquire any property in India. The plaintiff deserted her and her children and she had

Mrs. Dr. Tapati Sengupta and Ms. Amgana Sengupta Vs. Enforcement Offic ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : FERA

Reported in : 1998(60)ECC48

Matched in: Parties Mrs. Dr. Tapati Sengupta and Ms. Amgana Sengupta Vs. Enforcement Officer, Enforcement Directorate (Fera) and ors.

S.K. JaIn Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : FERA

v. V.C. Shukla (1998) 3 SCC410[hereinafter referred to the V.C. Shukla case]..2. The present proceedings which emanated under FERA are stated to stand on a different footing, not affected by the closure of the criminal proceedings since

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Abn Amro Bank and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : FERA

Acts : Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 6(4), 6(5), 19, 29, 29(1), 30 (1), 47, 47(1), 49, 54 and 68(1); ;Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 - Sections 35

Reported in : [2007]138CompCas582(Delhi); 124(2005)DLT137; 2005(84)DRJ593; [2008]81SCL443(Delhi)

of notification No. 180/1998 and as such, violated the Provisions of Section 29(1)(b) and Section 19(1)(a) of the FERA, 1973. According to the appellant not only that the respondents No. 2 to 4 established a foreign company

Sunil Arvindbhai Kapadia Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Subject : FERACriminal

Acts : Constitution of India

Reported in : (2000)1GLR72

under Section 7 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1993 (46 of 1993) (hereinafter referred to as 'the FERA'). The company was authorised by the RBI vide the above licence dated 1.7.1998 and the said company was

Pawan Kumar Didwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : FERA

Reported in : 1994(48)ECC177,1995LC268(Calcutta)

arising out of the case started against the writ petitioner for alleged violation of Section 9(1)(d) under the FERA.2. The grounds alleged by the writ petitioner in this writ petition for moving the writ Court are that