Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mills Mill Vs. Hawkins

Mills Mill vs Hawkins

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-03-1958
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99508

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
355 U.S. 605
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mills Mill

Respondent

Hawkins

Excerpt

mills mill v. hawkins - 355 u.s. 605 (1958) u.s. supreme court mills mill v. hawkins, 355 u.s. 605 (1958) 355 u.s. 605 mills mill et al. v. hawkins et al., constituting the una water district commission. appeal from the supreme court of south carolina. no. 670. decided march 3, 1958. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: ___ s. c. ___. l. w. perrin, jr., edward p. perrin and j. davis kerr for appellants. harvey w. johnson for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. klig v. rogers, 355 u.s. 605 (1958) 355 u.s. 605 (1958) "> u.s. supreme court klig v. rogers, 355 u.s. 605 (1958) 355 u.s. 605 klig v. rogers, attorney general. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit. no. 143. decided march 3, 1958. upon suggestion of mootness, judgment of court of appeals vacated and case remanded to district court with directions to dismiss. reported below: 100 u.s. app. d.c. 294, 244 f.2d 742 . jack wasserman and david carliner for petitioner. solicitor general rankin for respondent. per curiam. upon suggestion of mootness by all of the parties, the judgment of the court of appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court with directions to dismiss the cause as moot. page 355 u.s. 605, 606

Full Judgment

MILLS MILL v. HAWKINS - 355 U.S. 605 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court MILLS MILL v. HAWKINS, 355 U.S. 605 (1958) 355 U.S. 605

MILLS MILL ET AL. v. HAWKINS ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE UNA WATER DISTRICT
COMMISSION.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 670.
Decided March 3, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: ___ S. C. ___.

L. W. Perrin, Jr., Edward P. Perrin and J. Davis Kerr for appellants.

Harvey W. Johnson for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


KLIG v. ROGERS, <a href="/99508"> 355 U.S. 605 </a> (1958) 355 U.S. 605 (1958) "> U.S. Supreme Court KLIG v. ROGERS, 355 U.S. 605 (1958) 355 U.S. 605

KLIG v. ROGERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 143.
Decided March 3, 1958.

Upon suggestion of mootness, judgment of Court of Appeals vacated and case remanded to District Court with directions to dismiss.

Reported below: 100 U.S. App. D.C. 294, 244 F.2d 742 .

Jack Wasserman and David Carliner for petitioner.

Solicitor General Rankin for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Upon suggestion of mootness by all of the parties, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the cause as moot.

Page 355 U.S. 605, 606



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial