Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ray Vs. Blair

Ray vs Blair

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Apr-03-1952
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/98693

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
343 U.S. 154
Subject
Election

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Election

Key legal issue
Election

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ray

Respondent

Blair

Excerpt

.....___, 57 so.2d 395, reversed. per curiam. in this proceeding, an alabama circuit court entered an order directing petitioner to certify to the secretary of alabama the name of respondent as a candidate for nomination for presidential and vice-residential elector in the primary election of the democratic party to be held on may 6, 1952. the alabama supreme court affirmed on the single ground that the order was compelled by article ii, section 1 and the twelfth amendment of the united states constitution. petitioner applied to this court for a stay of the judgments and mandates of the alabama courts and filed a petition for writ of certiorari to review the judgment of page 343 u. s. 155 the alabama supreme court. on march 24, 1952, we granted certiorari and ordered the judgments and mandates of the courts below stayed pending further consideration and disposition of the case by this court. the case was assigned for argument on the stay as well as the merits on march 31, 1952. 343 u.s. 901. the question raised in this case has been thoroughly briefed and argued. the court has fully considered the question and has reached its conclusion. it now announces its decision and enters its judgment in advance of the preparation of a full opinion which, when prepared, will be filed with the clerk. [ see post, p. 343 u. s. 214 .] the court holds that article ii, section 1 and the twelfth amendment of the constitution do not compel issuance of the order and judgment entered below. the judgment below is reversed. the mandate of this court is directed to issue forthwith. reversed. mr. justice douglas and mr. justice jackson dissent. mr. justice black and mr. justice frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Full Judgment

Ray v. Blair - 343 U.S. 154 (1952)
U.S. Supreme Court Ray v. Blair, 343 U.S. 154 (1952)

Ray v. Blair

No. 649

Argued March 31, 1952

Decided April 3, 1952

343 U.S. 154

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

SYLLABUS

Article II, § 1, and the Twelfth Amendment of the Constitution do not compel issuance of the order entered by an Alabama state court in this mandamus proceeding directing petitioner, as Chairman of the State Democratic Executive Committee of Alabama, to certify to the Secretary of Alabama the name of respondent as a candidate for nomination for Presidential and Vice-Presidential elector in the primary election of the Democratic Party to be held on May 6, 1952. Pp. 343 U. S. 154 -155.

257 Ala. ___, 57 So.2d 395, reversed.

PER CURIAM.

In this proceeding, an Alabama circuit court entered an order directing petitioner to certify to the Secretary of Alabama the name of respondent as a candidate for nomination for Presidential and Vice-residential elector in the primary election of the Democratic Party to be held on May 6, 1952. The Alabama Supreme Court affirmed on the single ground that the order was compelled by Article II, Section 1 and the Twelfth Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Petitioner applied to this Court for a stay of the judgments and mandates of the Alabama courts and filed a petition for writ of certiorari to review the judgment of

Page 343 U. S. 155

the Alabama Supreme Court. On March 24, 1952, we granted certiorari and ordered the judgments and mandates of the courts below stayed pending further consideration and disposition of the case by this Court. The case was assigned for argument on the stay as well as the merits on March 31, 1952. 343 U.S. 901.

The question raised in this case has been thoroughly briefed and argued. The Court has fully considered the question and has reached its conclusion. It now announces its decision and enters its judgment in advance of the preparation of a full opinion which, when prepared, will be filed with the Clerk. [ See post, p. 343 U. S. 214 .]

The Court holds that Article II, Section 1 and the Twelfth Amendment of the Constitution do not compel issuance of the order and judgment entered below.

The judgment below is reversed. The mandate of this Court is directed to issue forthwith.

Reversed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE JACKSON dissent.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial