Advanced Search Results

Chandan Kumar Sarkar Vs. Chief Election Commissioner, New Delhi and or ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Election

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 324 and 326

During the scrutiny of the nomination paper no objection was raised by any of the candidate or their election agents against the nomination and the Returning Officer found the nomination paper valid and accepted the same thereby

State of Karnataka and Another, Etc. Vs. N.A. Nagendrappa and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Election

Acts : Karnataka Zilla Parishads, Taluk Panchayat Samithis, Mandal Panchayats and Nyaya Panchayats Act, 1985 - Sections 5(5), 14(1) and 18(1); Karnataka General Clauses Act, 1899 - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Articles 77(3), 166(3), 173, 226, 227, 309, 324(1), 327, 328 and 329; Karnataka Zilla Parishads, Taluk Panchayat Samithis, Mandal Panchayats and Nyaya Panchayats Act, 1983 - Sections 4 and 5(5); Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Samithis and Zilla Parishads Act - Sections 3; Madras General Clauses Act - Sections 15; Bihar and Orissa General Clauses Act - Sections 23 to 27; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 30, 31, 110(2) and 153; Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961 - Rule 3; Ballot Act, 1872 - Sections 98 and 100; U.P. Municipalities (Conduct of Election of

Reported in : AIR1991Kant317; ILR1991KAR1057; 1991(2)KarLJ172

under Rule 12 of the Karnataka Zilla Farishads, Taluk Panchayat Samithis, Mandal Panchayats and Nyaya Panchayats (Conduct of Election) Rules, 1985 (for short 'the Rules'), published in the Karnataka Gazette dated 30-12-1986 a Notification for election calling

T.M. Chandrasekhar Vs. L.R. Shivaramegowda

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 8A, 10A, 77, 77 (1) to 77(3), 100, 123, 123(6), 127A and 127A(3); Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 - Rules 86 and 90

Reported in : ILR1992KAR444; 1991(3)KarLJ308

ORDERHiremath, J.1. The petitioner in this Election Petition is the son of Sri T.Mariappa a freedom fighter, an ardent and zealous Congressman and also one

Eppala China Venkateswarlu and ors. Vs. Secretary to Government, Socia ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Election

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 2, 7, 8, 9, 10(4), 11, 11F, 12BB, 13, 13(1), 14, 14(3), 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 22A, 23, 24, 26, 80, 80A, 81, 100, 105, 170, 204, 233, 242A, 242D, 268 and 268(1); Hyderabad Land Revenue Act - Sections 5; Andhra Pradesh Gram Panchayat Act, 1964; Andhra Pradesh Mandal Praja Parishads, Zilla Praja Parishads and Zilla Pranalika and Abhivrudhi Sameeksha Mandals Act, 1986; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 32, 37, 40, 116, 120, 128, 133(2), 133(3), 136, 143K(1), 143K(4), 145, 170(1), 196, 197(3), 204(3), 206, 210, 224A, 226, 226(1), 227, 231(1), 239(2), 243, 243B, 243C, 243D, 243E, 243G, 243H, 243I, 243K, 243K(1), 243K(3), 243M, 243M(1), 243M(4), 243N, 243O, 243T, 243ZA, 243ZC, 243ZG, 244, 244A, 246(1), 246(2), 247, 249(1), 250(1), 2

Reported in : 2006(5)ALD409

members of Scheduled Tribe and pass an order which will have the effect of stultifying the process of election, is the question which arises for determination in this petition filed by Shri Eppala China Venkateswarlu and 41

Sushil Kumar Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ElectionTrusts and Societies

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 - Sections 29, 29(3), 29(5), 29(6) and 29(7); Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 - Sections 30 and 30A; Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Rules, 1968 - Rules 89, 87, 407, 409, 410, 417, 418, 432, 439, 439(1), 439(2), 439(3), 440, 441(2), 441(3), 443, 444C and 444C(2); Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 144T; Maharashtra Specified Co-operative Societies Elections to Committees Rules, 1971; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 123

Reported in : 2006(2)AWC1380

Pradeep Kant and Vineet Saran, JJ.1. In respect of the election of the Committee of Management of Zila Sahkari Bank Ltd., Shahjahanpur, after determination of constituencies' on 19.3.2005, the

Bidesh Singh Vs. Madhu Singh and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Election

Acts : Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 - Rules 52(2) and 56(2); Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 82, 86(4) and 97

Reported in : [2005(1)JCR173(Jhr)]

Vishnudeo Narayan, J.1. This election petition has been filed by the above named petitioner who was one of the contesting candidates of 318

Harbans Singh Jalal, Ex-mla Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through Secretar ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 15; Constitution of India - Article 324

Reported in : (1997)116PLR778

K. Sreedharan, J.1. An issue of far reaching consequences is raised in this writ petition. It is whether; Election Commission can control the activities of Government during the period subsequent to the announcement of election to the

Lakshmi Charan Sen and ors. Vs. A.K.M. Hassan Uzzaman and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1950 - Sections 15, 21(2) and (3) and 23(3); Registration of Electors Rules, 1960 - Rules 4 to 23; Constitution of India - Articles 168, 226, 324, 324(1), 324(2), 325, 327 and 329; Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968

Reported in : 1985(2)SCALE384; (1985)4SCC689; [1985]Supp1SCR493; 1986(1)LC104(SC)

of the Constitution asking for the writs of mandamus and certiorari, directing that the instructions issued by the Election Commission should not be implemented by the Chief Electoral Officer and others; that the revision of electoral rolls

Mohinder Singh Gill and anr. Vs. the Chief Election Commissioner, New ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

Acts : Administrative Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 324 and 329; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 58, 64A, 98, 100 and 100(1)

Reported in : AIR1978SC851; (1978)1SCC405; [1978]2SCR272

law, but the possible confusion about a few constitutional fundamentals., finer administrative normae and jurisdictional limitations bearing upon elections. What are those fundamentals and limitations We will state them, after mentioning, briefly what the writ petition, from

Manohar Joshi Vs. NitIn Bhaurao Patil and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 81(1), 83, 86, 98, 99, 100, 101 and 123; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 10; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 153A, 153B and 295A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 16, Rule 6; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4; Indian Limitation Act, 1877; Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Sections 4; Representation of the People (Conduct of Elections and Election Petitions) Rules, 1951 - Rules 2(6) and 119; Evidence Act - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 1996IAD(SC)93; AIR1996SC796; JT1995(8)SC646; 1995(7)SCALE30; (1996)1SCC169; [1995]Supp6SCR421

'the R.P. Act') against the judgment dated 26.4.1993 by S.N. Variava, J. of the Bombay High Court in Election Petition No. 24 of 1990 whereby the election of the appellant Manohar Joshi to the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly