Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Gerende Vs. Election Board

Gerende vs Election Board

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Apr-12-1951
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/98585

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
341 U.S. 56
Subject
Election

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Election

Key legal issue
Election

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Gerende

Respondent

Election Board

Excerpt

.....gerende v. election board no. 577 argued april 9, 1951 decided april 12, 1951 341 u.s. 56 appeal from the court of appeals of maryland syllabus a decision by the highest court of maryland upholding the validity of a maryland law, construed as requiring that, in order for a candidate for public office in that state to obtain a place on the ballot, he must make oath that he is not engaged "in one way or another in the attempt to overthrow the government by force or violence," and that he is not knowingly a member of an organization engaged in such an attempt, is here affirmed on the understanding that an affidavit in those terms fully satisfies the requirement. pp. 341 u. s. 56 -57. ___ md., ___ 78 a.2d 660, affirmed. per curiam. this is an appeal from a decision of the court of appeals of the maryland the effect of which is to deny the appellant a place on the ballot for a municipal election in the city of baltimore on the ground that she has refused to file an affidavit required by state law. md.laws 1949, c. 86, § 15, 78 a.2d 660. the scope of the state law was passed on in shub v. simpson, ___ md. ___, 76 a.2d 332. we read this decision to hold that to obtain a place on a maryland ballot a candidate need only make oath that he is not a person who is engaged "in one way or another in the attempt page 341 u. s. 57 to overthrow the government by force or violence," and that he is not knowingly a member of an organization engaged in such an attempt. 76 a.2d at 338. at the bar of this court, the attorney general of the maryland declared that he would advise the proper authorities to accept an affidavit in these terms as satisfying in full the statutory requirement. under these circumstances, and with this understanding, the judgment of the maryland court of appeals is affirmed. mr. justice reed concurs in the result.

Full Judgment

Gerende v. Election Board - 341 U.S. 56 (1951)
U.S. Supreme Court Gerende v. Election Board, 341 U.S. 56 (1951)

Gerende v. Election Board

No. 577

Argued April 9, 1951

Decided April 12, 1951

341 U.S. 56

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND

SYLLABUS

A decision by the highest court of Maryland upholding the validity of a Maryland law, construed as requiring that, in order for a candidate for public office in that State to obtain a place on the ballot, he must make oath that he is not engaged "in one way or another in the attempt to overthrow the government by force or violence," and that he is not knowingly a member of an organization engaged in such an attempt, is here affirmed on the understanding that an affidavit in those terms fully satisfies the requirement. Pp. 341 U. S. 56 -57.

___ Md., ___ 78 A.2d 660, affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Court of Appeals of the Maryland the effect of which is to deny the appellant a place on the ballot for a municipal election in the City of Baltimore on the ground that she has refused to file an affidavit required by state law. Md.Laws 1949, c. 86, § 15, 78 A.2d 660. The scope of the State law was passed on in Shub v. Simpson, ___ Md. ___, 76 A.2d 332. We read this decision to hold that to obtain a place on a Maryland ballot a candidate need only make oath that he is not a person who is engaged "in one way or another in the attempt

Page 341 U. S. 57

to overthrow the government by force or violence," and that he is not knowingly a member of an organization engaged in such an attempt. 76 A.2d at 338. At the bar of this Court, the Attorney General of the Maryland declared that he would advise the proper authorities to accept an affidavit in these terms as satisfying in full the statutory requirement. Under these circumstances, and with this understanding, the judgment of the Maryland Court of Appeals is

Affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE REED concurs in the result.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial