Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Chandra Mohan Singh Vs. the State of Bihar and ors

Chandra Mohan Singh vs The State of Bihar and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 11, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974980

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Chandra Mohan Singh

Respondent

The State of Bihar and ors

Excerpt

.....education extension officer, parbatta, khagaria 11. the panchayat secretary, gram panchayat chautham, khagaria 12. the panchayat secretary, aguwani, p.s. parbatta, district khagaria 13. chandra mohan singh @ dhunmun singh son of ram binay singh resident of village - nawada, p.s. chautham, district khagaria ---------------------------------”11. 01.2012 on the matter being remitted back from this court, the appellate authority has held the enquiry, has noticed the petitioner as well as respondent no.13 and has given them opportunity to produce certificates in respect of their rival claim that they are 2 actually chandra mohan singh and other person is impersonating as such. after looking to the materials produced by the parties, it has held that the respondent no.13 is the genuine chandra mohan singh and this petitioner, who claims to be chandra mohan singh, is actually ramanand singh and own brother of the said chandra mohan singh. the findings of the appellate authority are on facts and based on materials and documents placed before it which this court finds as correct. hence, this court does not find any valid grounds for interference with the same. the writ application is accordingly dismissed. arvind/ ( j.n. singh, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.494 o”

1. Chandra Mohan Singh Son Of Ram Binay Singh Resident Of Village - Nawada, P.O. Nawada, P.S. Chautham, District - Khagaria, At Present Prakhand Teacher, Madhya Vidyalaya, Agwani, P.S. Parbatta, District - Khagaria Versus 1. The State Of Bihar, Through the Chief Secretary, Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna 2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna 3. The Director, Primary Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 4. The District Magistrate, Khagaria 5. The District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority, Khagaria 6. The District Superintendent of Education cum District Programme C0-Ordinator, Khagaria 7. The Block Development Officer, Chautham, Khagaria 8. The Block Development Officer, Parbatta, Khagaria 9. The Block Education Extension Officer, Chautham, Khagaria 10. The Block Education Extension Officer, Parbatta, Khagaria 11. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Chautham, Khagaria 12. The Panchayat Secretary, Aguwani, P.S. Parbatta, District Khagaria 13. Chandra Mohan Singh @ Dhunmun Singh Son Of Ram Binay Singh Resident Of Village - Nawada, P.S. Chautham, District Khagaria ---------------------------------”

11. 01.2012 On the matter being remitted back from this Court, the Appellate Authority has held the enquiry, has noticed the petitioner as well as respondent no.13 and has given them opportunity to produce certificates in respect of their rival claim that they are 2 actually Chandra Mohan Singh and other person is impersonating as such. After looking to the materials produced by the parties, it has held that the respondent no.13 is the genuine Chandra Mohan Singh and this petitioner, who claims to be Chandra Mohan Singh, is actually Ramanand Singh and own brother of the said Chandra Mohan Singh. The findings of the Appellate Authority are on facts and based on materials and documents placed before it which this Court finds as correct. Hence, this Court does not find any valid grounds for interference with the same. The writ application is accordingly dismissed. Arvind/ ( J.N. Singh, J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial