Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jones Vs. Opelika

Jones vs Opelika

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided May-03-1943
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/97498

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
319 U.S. 103
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jones

Respondent

Opelika

Excerpt

jones v. opelika - 319 u.s. 103 (1943) u.s. supreme court jones v. opelika, 319 u.s. 103 (1943) jones v. opelika no. 280, october term, 1941 reargued march 10, 11, 1943 decided may 3, 1943 319 u.s. 103 certiorari to the supreme court of alabama syllabus upon rehearing, 318 u.s. 796, the judgments heretofore entered in these cases, 316 u. s. 316 u.s. 584, affirming the judgments of the state courts, are vacated, and the judgments of the state courts are reversed. p. 319 u. s. 104 . 242 ala. 549, 7 so.2d 503, reversed. 202 ark. 614, 151 s.w.2d 1000, reversed. 58 ariz. 144, 118 p.2d 97, reversed. page 319 u. s. 104 per curiam (announced by mr. justice douglas). the judgments in these cases were affirmed at the october term, 1941. 316 u. s. 316 u.s. 584. because the issues in all three cases were of the same character as those brought before us in other cases by applications for certiorari at the present term, we ordered a reargument and heard these cases together with murdock v. pennsylvania, post, p. 319 u. s. 105 . for the reasons stated in the opinion of the court in the murdock case and in the dissenting opinions filed in the present cases after the argument last term, the court is of opinion that the judgment in each case should be reversed. the judgments of this court heretofore entered in these cases are therefore vacated, and the judgments of the state courts are reversed. so ordered. for dissenting opinions of mr. justice reed, and mr. justice frankfurter, see post, pp. 319 u. s. 117 -140.

Full Judgment

Jones v. Opelika - 319 U.S. 103 (1943)
U.S. Supreme Court Jones v. Opelika, 319 U.S. 103 (1943)

Jones v. Opelika

No. 280, October Term, 1941

Reargued March 10, 11, 1943

Decided May 3, 1943

319 U.S. 103

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

SYLLABUS

Upon rehearing, 318 U.S. 796, the judgments heretofore entered in these cases, 316 U. S. 316 U.S. 584, affirming the judgments of the state courts, are vacated, and the judgments of the state courts are reversed. P. 319 U. S. 104 .

242 Ala. 549, 7 So.2d 503, reversed.

202 Ark. 614, 151 S.W.2d 1000, reversed.

58 Ariz. 144, 118 P.2d 97, reversed.

Page 319 U. S. 104

PER CURIAM (announced by MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS).

The judgments in these cases were affirmed at the October Term, 1941. 316 U. S. 316 U.S. 584. Because the issues in all three cases were of the same character as those brought before us in other cases by applications for certiorari at the present term, we ordered a reargument and heard these cases together with Murdock v. Pennsylvania, post, p. 319 U. S. 105 . For the reasons stated in the opinion of the Court in the Murdock case and in the dissenting opinions filed in the present cases after the argument last term, the Court is of opinion that the judgment in each case should be reversed. The judgments of this Court heretofore entered in these cases are therefore vacated, and the judgments of the state courts are reversed.

So ordered.

For dissenting opinions of MR. JUSTICE REED, and MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER, see post, pp. 319 U. S. 117 -140.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial