Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

WisconsIn Vs. Illinois

Wisconsin vs illinois

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1929
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/95184

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
279 U.S. 821
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Wisconsin

Respondent

illinois

Excerpt

wisconsin v. illinois - 279 u.s. 821 (1929) u.s. supreme court wisconsin v. illinois, 279 u.s. 821 (1929) 279 u.s. 821 no. 7, original. the state of wisconsin et al., complainants, v. the state of illinois et al.; no. 11 , original. state of michigan, complainant, v. the state of illinois et al.; no. 12, original. state of new york, complainant. v. state of illinois et al. supreme court of the united states april 22, 1929 and messrs. wm. j. morgan and ralph m. hoyt, both of milwaukee, wis., herman l. ekern, of madison, wis., c. l. hilton, of st. paul, minn., e. c. turner and c. c. crabbe, both of columbus, ohio, geo. w. woodruff, of philadelphia, pa., newton d. baker, of cleveland, ohio, john w. reynolds, of madison, wis., r. t. jackson, of mineral point, wis., g. a. youngquist, of st. paul, minn., for the state of wisconsin and others. messrs. edw. j. brundage, wm. f. mulvihill, morton s. cressy, edmond d. adcock, oscar e. carlstrom, h. a. brouillet, jas. hamilton lewis, geo. f. barrett, and louis j. behan, all of chicago, ill., j. t. kenworthy and cyrus e. dietz, both of rock island, ill., hugh s. johnson, of springfield, ill., maclay hoyne, of chicago, ill., and james m. beck, of washington, d. c., for the state of illinois and others. messrs. wilber m. brucker, atty. gen., a. b. dougherty, william w. potter, and arthur e. kidder, all of lansing, mich., for the state of michigan. messrs. hamilton ward, atty. gen., of new york city, albert j. danaher, asst. atty. gen., of albany, n. y., albert ottinger, of new york city, r. j. le boeuf, jr., of albany, n. y., and nathan l. miller, of new york city, for the state of new york. messrs. north t. gentry, of columbia, mo., daniel n. kirby, of st. louis, mo., and cornelius lynde, of chicago, ill., for intervener state of missouri. mr. f. m. thompson, of nashville, tenn., for intervener state of tennessee. mr. f. e. daugherty, of louisville, ky., for intervener state of kentucky. mr. percy sa

Full Judgment

WISCONSIN v. ILLINOIS - 279 U.S. 821 (1929)
U.S. Supreme Court WISCONSIN v. ILLINOIS, 279 U.S. 821 (1929)

279 U.S. 821

No. 7, original. The STATE OF WISCONSIN et al., complainants, v. The STATE OF ILLINOIS et al.;
No. 11
, original. STATE OF MICHIGAN, complainant, v. The STATE OF ILLINOIS et al.; No. 12, original. STATE OF NEW YORK, complainant. v. STATE OF ILLINOIS et al. Supreme Court of the United States April 22, 1929 and Messrs. Wm. J. Morgan and Ralph M. Hoyt, both of Milwaukee, Wis., Herman L. Ekern, of Madison, Wis., C. L. Hilton, of St. Paul, Minn., E. C. Turner and C. C. Crabbe, both of Columbus, Ohio, Geo. W. Woodruff, of Philadelphia, Pa., Newton D. Baker, of Cleveland, Ohio, John W. Reynolds, of Madison, Wis., R. T. Jackson, of Mineral Point, Wis., G. A. Youngquist, of St. Paul, Minn., for the State of Wisconsin and others. Messrs. Edw. J. Brundage, Wm. F. Mulvihill, Morton S. Cressy, Edmond D. Adcock, Oscar E. Carlstrom, H. A. Brouillet, Jas. Hamilton Lewis, Geo. F. Barrett, and Louis J. Behan, all of Chicago, Ill., J. T. Kenworthy and Cyrus E. Dietz, both of Rock Island, Ill., Hugh S. Johnson, of Springfield, Ill., Maclay Hoyne, of Chicago, Ill., and James M. Beck, of Washington, D. C., for the State of Illinois and others. Messrs. Wilber M. Brucker, Atty. Gen., A. B. Dougherty, William W. Potter, and Arthur E. Kidder, all of Lansing, Mich., for the State of Michigan. Messrs. Hamilton Ward, Atty. Gen., of New York City, Albert J. Danaher, Asst. Atty. Gen., of Albany, N. Y., Albert Ottinger, of New York City, R. J. Le Boeuf, Jr., of Albany, N. Y., and Nathan L. Miller, of New York City, for the State of New York. Messrs. North T. Gentry, of Columbia, Mo., Daniel N. Kirby, of St. Louis, Mo., and Cornelius Lynde, of Chicago, Ill., for intervener State of Missouri. Mr. F. M. Thompson, of Nashville, Tenn., for intervener State of Tennessee. Mr. F. E. Daugherty, of Louisville, Ky., for intervener State of Kentucky. Mr. Percy Saint, of New Orleans, La., for intervener State of Louisiana. Mr. H. W. Applegate, of Little Rock, Ark., for intervener State of Arkansas. Mr. Rush H. Knox, of Jackson, Miss., for intervener State of Mississippi. Motion of the City of Chicago for leave to intervene denied.[ Wisconsin v. Illinois 279 U.S. 821 (1929) ]

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial