Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Cc, Chennai Vs. M/S. Jamara Textile Processing Pvt. Ltd.

Cc, Chennai vs M/S. Jamara Textile Processing Pvt. Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai Decided Mar 11, 2010
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/943416

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
C/S/90 of 2010 & C/101 of 2010
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Cc, Chennai

Advocate Shri C. Dhanasekaran, SDR, for the appellant. Shri R. Hari, Adv., for the respondent.

Respondent

M/S. Jamara Textile Processing Pvt. Ltd.

Excerpt

heard both sides. i find that the lower appellate authority has remanded the matter to the original authority for issue of a favourable order after following the principles of natural justice. i find nothing wrong with his order as in the first instance, the original authority has not passed any speaking order. one fails to appreciate why the department is filing an appeal against the order of the lower appellate authority who was merely directed the original authority to pass a speaking order! as such, the department s appeal along with the stay petition is dismissed.

Full Judgment

Heard both sides. I find that the lower appellate authority has remanded the matter to the original authority for issue of a favourable order after following the principles of natural justice. I find nothing wrong with his order as in the first instance, the original authority has not passed any speaking order. One fails to appreciate why the department is filing an appeal against the order of the lower appellate authority who was merely directed the original authority to pass a speaking order! As such, the department s appeal along with the stay petition is dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial