Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Customs, Chennai Vs. M/S. Vone Technology India
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Mar-26-2010
Service Tax
Shri C. Dhanasekaran, SDR for the Appellant.
Per Dr. Chittaranjan Satapathy The respondents are not present despite notice. There is also no adjournment request. Heard the learned SDR Shri C. Dhanasekaran appearing for the Department. The Department is in appeal because the authorities...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Sabari Tex Vs. Cce, Salem
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Dec-11-2009
Service Tax
Shri K.A. Vimal Kumar, Advocate for the Appellants. Shri C. Dhanasekaran, SDR for the Respondent.
Heard both sides. This is a case involving a petty amount of Rs.22,880/-. The demand has been made on the appellant proprietary concern on the ground that the appellant has manufactured processed fabrics (sarees). The learned...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise, Madurai Vs. Alamelu Tex
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Dec-14-2009
Land Acquisition
Shri C.Dhanasekaran, SDR. Decision on merit
Heard ld. SDR Shri C.Dhanasekaran appearing on behalf of the department. Also perused the written submissions filed by the respondents. In this case, the lower appellate authority has taken into account the submissions by the respondents...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Nmvst Alloy Cast Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Salem
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Mar-09-2010
Service Tax
Shri R.Balagopal, Consultant. Shri C.Dhanasekaran, SDR.
Heard both sides. Shri R.Balagopal, ld. consultant appearing for the appellants states that the appellants were not aware that there was service tax liability on them as recipients of the GTA service. As soon as the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Vasta Marketing Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Chennai
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Dec-01-2009
MRTP
Shri Sriprakash, Advocate, for the Appellants. Shri C. Dhanasekaran, SDR for the Respondent.
Per Dr. Chittaranjan Satapathy The appellants have imported Uni-Lite XCEL claiming classification under CTH 9027.80 as an instrument for measuring quantity of light. The authorities below have classified the same under CTH 9031.80 as measuring or...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Intimate Fashions India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Exc ...
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Jan-13-2011
Service Tax
Shri S. Muthuvenkataraman, Advocate, for the Appellants. Shri C. Dhanasekaran, SDR for the Respondent.
Per Dr. Chittaranjan Satapathy Heard both sides. 2. Shri S.Muthuvenkataraman, learned counsel appearing for the appellants states that the appellants have been denied credit of service tax paid by them on the commission given to foreign...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCce, Chennai Vs. M/S. Visteon Automotive Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Jul-13-2010
Service Tax
Shri C. Dhanasekaran, SDR for the Appellant. Shri K.S. Venkatagiri, Advocate for the Respondents.
Heard both sides. Shri K.S. Venkatagiri, learned counsel appearing for the respondent states that the dispute in this case relates to eligibility in respect of input service tax credit on catering service used by the appellants...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Subramaniam Electric Fabricate Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise ...
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Jun-09-2010
Excise
Shri V. Srikanth, Advocate, for the Appellants. Shri C. Dhanasekaran, SDR for the Respondent.
Per Dr. Chittaranjan Satapathy Heard both sides. The Department had issued a show-cause notice demanding duty on MS street light tubular poles manufactured and cleared by the appellants without payment of duty. It has been contended...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Rajshree Laminates Ltd Vs. Cce, Coimbatore.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Oct-28-2009
Service Tax
None for the appellant. Shri C. Dhanasekaran, SDR, for the respondent.
Per: Dr. Chittaranjan Satapathy None appeared for the appellants. The written submissions dated 27.10.2009 filed by the Counsel for the appellant is taken on record. 2. Heard Shri C. Dhanasekaran, Ld. SDR, appearing for the department....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Lakshmi Packaging Private Ltd. Vs. Cce, Salem
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Dec-11-2009
Service Tax
Shri J.R. Srinivasan, Consultant for the Appellants. Shri C. Dhanasekaran, SDR for the Respondent.
Heard both sides. Shri J.R. Srinivasan, learned consultant appearing for the appellant states that there is actually no shortage as the appellants had followed a faulty practice in accounting the raw material register at the material...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »