Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Modipon Ltd. Vs. C.C.E., Ghaziabad

Modipon Ltd. vs C.C.E., Ghaziabad

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Jun 17, 2010
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/943168

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Service Tax Appeal No.856 of 2009-SM
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Modipon Ltd.

Advocate Shri I. Baig, Authorized Departmental Representative (SDR) for the Revenue

Respondent

C.C.E., Ghaziabad

Excerpt

per m. veeraiyan: on 22.4.2010, the matter was adjourned specifically to 17.6.2010 on appellant s request. none appears for the appellant today. there is no adjournment request on record. it is apparent that the appellant is not serious in pursuing the appeal. 2. in view of the above, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Full Judgment

Per M. Veeraiyan:

On 22.4.2010, the matter was adjourned specifically to 17.6.2010 on appellant s request. None appears for the appellant today. There is no adjournment request on record. It is apparent that the appellant is not serious in pursuing the appeal.

2. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial