Advanced Search Results
M/S. Pooja Cables Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Cce, Bhopal
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Mar-18-2010
Service Tax
Shri Z.U. Alvi, Advocate for the appellants; Shri I. Baig, Authorised Representative (SDR) for the Revenue
Per RAKESH KUMAR: The appellants are SSI unit availing SSI exemption. During the period of dispute while they paid the duty at concessional rate, they recovered full duty from their customers. On that basis, a demand...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCce, Indore Vs. M/S. Allied Asia Gears Ltd., Shri Ramesh Tourani, Dire ...
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Jan-21-2010
Excise
Shri I. Baig, Representative (SDR) for the Revenue
Per RAKESH KUMAR: Facts leading to filing of these two appeals by the Revenue and the cross objections by the respondents are, in brief, as under:- 1.1. M/s. Allied Asia Gears Ltd. (hereinafter referred as the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCce, Jaipur-i Vs. M/S. Iceberg Foods Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Mar-18-2010
Service Tax
Shri I. Baig, Authorised Representative (SDR) for the Revenue;
Per RAKESH KUMAR: The Respondents are manufacturer of Packaged Drinking Water and Soda Water chargeable to Central Excise duty under Chapter Sub-heading 20011010 and 2201020 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. They...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ranutrol Instrumentation Ltd Vs. C.C.E., Delhi
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Jul-02-2012
Excise
Present for the Appellant: J.M. Sharma, Consultant, Advocate. Present for the Respondent: I. Baig, A.R.
Per Mr. Rakesh Kumar (Oral): 1 The appellant are engaged in the manufacture of electrical equipment chargeable to central excise duty under Chapter 85 and 90 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. They were availing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCce, Jalandhar Vs. Zoloto Malleables
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Mar-01-2012
Excise
For the Appellant: I. Baig, AR. For the Respondent: Ravi Chopta, Advocate.
Per Ms. Archana Wadhwa, J. 1. Being aggrieved with the order passed by Commissioner (Appeals), Revenue has filed the present appeal. We have heard Shri I.Baig, ld. AR appearing for the Revenue and Shri Ravi Chopra,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCce, Jaipur Vs. Vinayak Agrotech Ltd
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Feb-29-2012
Service Tax
For the Appellants: Ms. Sukritit Das, Advocate. For the Respondent: Sanjay Jain, AR.
Per Ms. Archana Wadhwa: 1. Being aggrieved with the order passed by Commissioner (Appeals), Revenue has filed the present appeal. We have heard Shri I.Baig, ld. AR appearing for the Revenue and Ms. Sukriti Das, ld....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCce, Allahabad Vs. M/S Basti Sugar Mills Co. Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Mar-31-2010
Service Tax
Shri I. Baig, DR.
Per D.N. Panda: Revenue has come in appeal to reverse the Appellate order passed by the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) upholding the imposition of penalty of Rs.10,000/- levied by the ld. Adjudicating Authority. Shri Baig, ld. DR...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCce, Kanpur Vs. M/S Keymen Laminators (P) Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Mar-31-2010
Excise
Shri I. Baig, DR.
Per D.N. Panda: None present for the Respondent. 2. Ld. DR Shri Baig assists for disposal of the matter. Appeal was filed in this case on 17.4.2008. That is nearly two years old. Keeping the matter...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskB.S.N.L. Vs. Cce, Lucknow
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Apr-12-2010
Service Tax
Shri I. Baig, Authorised Representative (DR) for the Revenue.
PER S.K. GAULE; None is present for the respondents despite notice. Heard Shri V.K. Saxena, learned Jt. CDR. 2. The applicants have not produced clearance from COD. Accordingly, the Stay application as well as appeal are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCce, Kanpur Vs. M/S Anod Pharma Pvt. Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Feb-04-2010
Excise
Shri I. Baig, SDR, Shri Manish Saharan, Advocate.
Per D.N. Panda: Ld. DR Shri Baig submits that both the authorities below failed to impose penalty when they appreciated the case was a case of unfound inventory taken on 6.6.06. There was no evidence led...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »