Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

K.Sundaram. Vs. Deivanai.

K.Sundaram. vs Deivanai.

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Aug 16, 2010
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/904651

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRP NPD No.2976 of 2007 and M.P.No.1 of 2007 & CRP NPD No.4037 of 2007
Subject
Tenancy

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act against the judgment and decree dated 12.01.2007 passed by the learned VIII Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai in RCA No.543 of 2002 modifying the order and decreetal order dated 22.03.2002 passed by the learned X...

Key legal issue
Tenancy
Acts & sections
Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 - Section 25

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K.Sundaram.

Advocate Mr.S.Sundaragopal, Adv.

Respondent

Deivanai.

Advocate Mr.V.Bhiman, Adv.

Legal References

Acts
Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 - Section 25

Excerpt

civil revision petition filed under section 25 of the tamil nadu buildings (lease and rent control) act against the judgment and decree dated 12.01.2007 passed by the learned viii judge, small causes court, chennai in rca no.543 of 2002 modifying the order and decreetal order dated 22.03.2002 passed by the learned xii judge, small causes court, chennai in rcop no.420 of 2000. prayer in crp no.4037 of 2007: civil revision petition filed under section 25 of the tamil nadu buildings (lease and rent control) act against the judgment and decree dated 12.01.2007 passed by the learned viii judge, small causes court, chennai in rca no.700 of 2003 thereby reversing the eviction order dated 09.01.2003 passed by the learned xii judge, small causes court, chennai in rcop no.718 of 1998. 1. heard both sides.2. at the hearing, the joint memo of compromise, signed by the parties to the lis herein and their respective advocates, has been filed. both the advocates in unison would pray for recording the said joint memorandum of compromise and for disposing of these two civil revision petitions, based on the same.3. perused the records.4. taking into consideration the submission made by the learned counsel on either side and the joint memorandum of compromise, i could see no reason not to record the same.5. accordingly, both these civil revision petitions are disposed of based on the joint memorandum of compromise and the joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of the decree. in the event of any default, the landlady is at liberty to execute the eviction order as per law. no costs. consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Full Judgment

1. Heard both sides.

2. At the hearing, the joint memo of compromise, signed by the parties to the lis herein and their respective Advocates, has been filed. Both the Advocates in unison would pray for recording the said joint memorandum of compromise and for disposing of these two civil revision petitions, based on the same.

3. Perused the records.

4. Taking into consideration the submission made by the learned counsel on either side and the joint memorandum of compromise, I could see no reason not to record the same.

5. Accordingly, both these civil revision petitions are disposed of based on the joint memorandum of compromise and the joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of the decree. In the event of any default, the landlady is at liberty to execute the eviction order as per law. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial