Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr s sundaragopal · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.018 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 23 2001

Balu Alias Balakrishnan Vs. Minor B. Sasikumar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-23-2001

Subject : Family

Reported in : (2001)3MLJ15

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R. Dhamodaran

E. Padmanabhan, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the writ defendant in O.S.No. 136 of 1984 on the file of the Sub Court, Madurai. Heard Mr. T.R. Rajaraman, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant Mr....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 1998

Muthusamy Vs. Indian Overseas Bank, Alangulam, Through Its Branch Mana ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-12-1998

Subject : limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 -- Sections 5

Reported in : 1998(1)CTC348; (1998)IIMLJ574

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S. Sundaragopal, Adv.

ORDER1. This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the fair order and decretal order dated 7.8.1997 passed in I.A.No.471 of 1995 in O.S.No.215 of 1988 on the file of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Srivilliputhur.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 02 1996

M/S Printo Stick and Another Vs. M.L. Oswal

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-02-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 219; Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138 and 142

Reported in : 1997CriLJ2122

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S. Sundaragopal, Adv.

ORDER1. The grievance of the petitioner in this revision is that more than three instances have been clubbed together in a single transaction, which is contrary to the mandate under Section 219, of the Cr.P.C.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 16 2010

K.Sundaram. Vs. Deivanai.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-16-2010

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 - Section 25

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.S.Sundaragopal, Adv.

1. Heard both sides.2. At the hearing, the joint memo of compromise, signed by the parties to the lis herein and their respective Advocates, has been filed. Both the Advocates in unison would pray for recording...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial