Advanced Search Results
Thakorelal Amratlal Vaidya Vs. Gujarat Revenue Tribunal and ors.
Gujarat
Feb-18-1963
TenancyCivil
Tenancy Law; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 2(18), 3, 4, 5, 5(1), 14, 27, 30 and 40; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Amendment) Act, 1956; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 4, 111, 116 and 117
AIR1964Guj183; (1963)4GLR841
is whether the heirs of a person who is a deemed tenant under Section 4 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1918, (hereinafter referred to as the Tenancy Act) are entitled to inherit the tenancy
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGlamour Cleaners Vs. Chandrakant Chhotalal Gandhi and anr.
Gujarat
May-01-1962
Tenancy
(1962)3GLR941
The question raised is a question of considerable importance and it is whether the holder of a statutory tenancy under the Bombay Rents Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Rent
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurya Properties Private Ltd. and ors. Vs. Bimalendu Nath Sarkar and o ...
Kolkata
Jun-19-1963
Tenancy
Transfer of Propety Act, 1882 - Sections 106 and 108; ;West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Section 13(6)
(p) of Section 108 of the Transfer of Property Act. It is alleged in the plaint that the tenancy was terminated by a notice dated 18th July, 1956, calling upon the defendant to give up possession on
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Madhao Tatya Sonar Vs. the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal at Nagpur and ...
Mumbai
Sep-12-1969
Tenancy
Tenancy Law; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 - Sections 2(18), 2(31), 2(32), 4, 6, 7, 8, 19(1), 20, 21(2), 23, 24, 24(1), 24(1A), 30, 36, 36(1), 36(2), 36(3), 36(3-A), 57-B(1) and 57-B(2); Transfer of Property Act - Sections 53-A; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 14, 14(1), 15, 15(1), 29, 29(1), 29(2) and 31; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Rules, 1959 - Rule 11
AIR1971Bom106; (1971)73BOMLR755; 1970MhLJ991
to obtain an order for possession of a field in regard to which a tenant has terminated his tenancy by surrendering his interest in favour of the landlord and the surrender has been verified under Section 20
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Emilia Tinoco (Deceased by Lrs.) Vs. Shashikant Naguesh Gad and O ...
Mumbai
Oct-04-1996
Tenancy
Constitution of India - Article 141; Transfer of Property Act, 1872 - Sections 105; Goa, Daman and Diu Buildings Lease Rent and Eviction Control Act, 1968 - Sections 56 and 59; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10(5); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 21
AIR1997Bom319; 1997(3)ALLMR13
to start business and non-payment of rent. The appellant sent a notice to the respondent No.1 terminating the tenancy with effect from 30th June, 1976. The notice is dated 29th April, 1976. The respondent No.1, in his
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHind Rubber Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Tayebhai Mohammedbhai Bagasarwall ...
Mumbai
Jul-03-1996
TenancyProperty
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105, 106, 108, 111, 112 and 113; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 12 and 28(1); Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 337, 342, 346, 351 and 354A; Constitution of India - Articles 59, 141 and 592; Rent Restriction Act - Sections 5, 16 and 17; Specific Relief Act, 1963; Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960; Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115; Increase of Rent and Mortgage Interest (Restrictions) Act, 1920 - Sections 15(1) and 17(2)
AIR1996Bom389; 1996(4)BomCR414; (1996)98BOMLR87
of a structure consisting of ground and first floor, was let out to the defendant No. 1. The tenancy was only with regard to the structure and not of land and it was let out to the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNagappa Balappa Bastwad Vs. Ramchandra Gundo
Mumbai
Aug-28-1945
TenancyProperty
AIR1946Bom365; (1946)48BOMLR225
that by this document Tungawa, the adoptive mother of plaintiff No. 1, sought to create rights of permanent tenancy in favour of Ningappa and their case was that this document was the result of undue influence practised
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP. Ratnam Yeshwantraj Mudliyar Vs. Vimalchandra Shiv Datta Grovar and ...
Mumbai
Aug-25-1972
Tenancy
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 100 and 101 - Order 9, Rule 9 - Order 23, Rule 1 - Order 41, Rule 27; C.P. and Berar Letting of the Houses and Rent Control Order, 1949 - Sections 13(1); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106
AIR1973Bom111; 1973MhLJ72
this bungalow the defendant was a tenant and after the purchase of the house the defendant attorned the tenancy of the premises in favour of the plaintiffs and also paid the rent. After purchase of the house,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVithal Ranganath Gaikwad and ors. Vs. Murlidhar Vaman Dhavale and anr.
Mumbai
Sep-10-1974
Tenancy
Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 15, 32-P and 37
AIR1975Bom358; (1975)77BOMLR387; ILR1976Bom1878
this Special Civil Application (NO. 2104 of 1970) pertains to the applicability of Section 37 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (hereinafter called the Tenancy Act( to proceedings taken and orders passed under Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBaburao Laxman Muley Vs. Shionath Mahadeo
Mumbai
Feb-08-1967
TenancyConstitution
(1967)69BOMLR734; 1967MhLJ670
the plaintiffs by notice exh. P-4. It is urged for the plaintiffs-landlords that they have already terminated the tenancy by a private notice like exh. P-4 under the provisions of Section 9(7) of the Berar Leases Act.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »