Advanced Search Results

Thakorelal Amratlal Vaidya Vs. Gujarat Revenue Tribunal and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Tenancy Law; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 2(18), 3, 4, 5, 5(1), 14, 27, 30 and 40; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Amendment) Act, 1956; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 4, 111, 116 and 117

Reported in : AIR1964Guj183; (1963)4GLR841

is whether the heirs of a person who is a deemed tenant under Section 4 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1918, (hereinafter referred to as the Tenancy Act) are entitled to inherit the tenancy

Surya Properties Private Ltd. and ors. Vs. Bimalendu Nath Sarkar and o ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Transfer of Propety Act, 1882 - Sections 106 and 108; ;West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Section 13(6)

(p) of Section 108 of the Transfer of Property Act. It is alleged in the plaint that the tenancy was terminated by a notice dated 18th July, 1956, calling upon the defendant to give up possession on

Hind Rubber Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Tayebhai Mohammedbhai Bagasarwall ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : TenancyProperty

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105, 106, 108, 111, 112 and 113; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 12 and 28(1); Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 337, 342, 346, 351 and 354A; Constitution of India - Articles 59, 141 and 592; Rent Restriction Act - Sections 5, 16 and 17; Specific Relief Act, 1963; Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960; Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115; Increase of Rent and Mortgage Interest (Restrictions) Act, 1920 - Sections 15(1) and 17(2)

Reported in : AIR1996Bom389; 1996(4)BomCR414; (1996)98BOMLR87

of a structure consisting of ground and first floor, was let out to the defendant No. 1. The tenancy was only with regard to the structure and not of land and it was let out to the

P. Ratnam Yeshwantraj Mudliyar Vs. Vimalchandra Shiv Datta Grovar and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 100 and 101 - Order 9, Rule 9 - Order 23, Rule 1 - Order 41, Rule 27; C.P. and Berar Letting of the Houses and Rent Control Order, 1949 - Sections 13(1); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106

Reported in : AIR1973Bom111; 1973MhLJ72

this bungalow the defendant was a tenant and after the purchase of the house the defendant attorned the tenancy of the premises in favour of the plaintiffs and also paid the rent. After purchase of the house,

Baburao Laxman Muley Vs. Shionath Mahadeo

Court : Mumbai

Subject : TenancyConstitution

Reported in : (1967)69BOMLR734; 1967MhLJ670

the plaintiffs by notice exh. P-4. It is urged for the plaintiffs-landlords that they have already terminated the tenancy by a private notice like exh. P-4 under the provisions of Section 9(7) of the Berar Leases Act.

Vasant Hariba Londhe Vs. Jagannath Eamghandra Kulkarni

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1969)71BOMLR12; 1969MhLJ249

referred to a Full Bench because it involves consideration of the provisions of Section 37 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act as amended and because the Division Bench before whom it came up for hearing

JasIn Tomu Damel Vs. Harischandra Pandurang Muranjan

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1959)61BOMLR1112

that he was a protected tenant of the lands and by virtue of Section 89 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (67 of 1948), which will hereafter be referred to as the Tenancy Act

Vishnu Bapu Tapkir Vs. Mohannagar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 2(8), 4, 70, 82, 84 and 85

Reported in : 1989(3)BomCR244

Society Limited (which will be referred to hereafter as the respondent society under section 84 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 & hereafter the Tenancy Act.) The contention of the respondent society is that

Arun S/O Rambhau Musale and anr. Vs. Sambha Soma Gond (Deleted) and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : TenancyLimitation

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 - Sections 49B, 100(12A) and 102, ;Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906 - Sections 5(3) and 7

Reported in : 1996(5)BomCR600

and 227 of the Constitution of India is whether the application filed under section 49-B of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 (for short 'the Tenancy Act') by the ousted tenant for transfer

Tippayya Kuppayya Vaidya Vs. Rama Narayana Hegde and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117 and 214; Tenancy Law; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 3, 5, 5(2), 5(3), 14, 14(1), 24, 25, 25(1), 25(2), 29, 29(1), 29(2), 29(3), 34 and 81; Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 - Sections 56; Common Law Procedure Act, 1852 - Sections 212; Rent Restriction Act

Reported in : AIR1961Kant131; AIR1961Mys131; ILR1960KAR1270

S.R. Das Gupta, C.J. 1. This petition raises a very important question relating to the Bombay Tenancy Act, The question broadly put is whether relief against forfeiture can be given under the said Act in