Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bachtel Vs. Wilson

Bachtel vs Wilson

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jan-07-1907
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/90375

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
204 U.S. 42
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bachtel

Respondent

Wilson

Excerpt

bachtel v. wilson - 204 u.s. 42 (1907) u.s. supreme court bachtel v. wilson, 204 u.s. 42 (1907) 204 u.s. 42 corwin d. bachtel, plff. in err., v. r. frank wilson, sheriff of stark county, ohio. no. 447. harvey h. miller, plff. in err., v. r. frank wilson, sheriff of stark county, ohio. no. 448. william l. davis, plff. in err., v. r. frank wilson, sheriff of stark county, ohio. no. 449. charles h. van horn, plff. in err., v. r. frank wilson, sheriff of stark county, ohio. no. 450. nos. 447, 448, 449, 450. argued november 14, 15, 1906. decided january 7, 1907. mr. william a. lynch for plaintiffs in error. messrs. charles c. upham and john w. craine for defendant in error. mr. justice brewer delivered the opinion of the court: the same question controls these cases as the one just decided, and, for the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, they are dismissed.[ bachtel v. wilson 204 u.s. 42 (1907) ]

Full Judgment

BACHTEL v. WILSON - 204 U.S. 42 (1907)
U.S. Supreme Court BACHTEL v. WILSON, 204 U.S. 42 (1907)

204 U.S. 42

CORWIN D. BACHTEL, Plff. in Err.,
v.
R. FRANK WILSON, Sheriff of Stark County, Ohio.
No. 447.

HARVEY H. MILLER, Plff. in Err.,
v.
R. FRANK WILSON, Sheriff of Stark County, Ohio.

No. 448.

WILLIAM L. DAVIS, Plff. in Err.,
v.
R. FRANK WILSON, Sheriff of Stark County, Ohio.

No. 449.

CHARLES H. VAN HORN, Plff. in Err.,
v.
R. FRANK WILSON, Sheriff of Stark County, Ohio.

No. 450.

Nos. 447, 448, 449, 450.
Argued November 14, 15, 1906.
Decided January 7, 1907.

Mr. William A. Lynch for plaintiffs in error.

Messrs. Charles C. Upham and John W. Craine for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Brewer delivered the opinion of the court:

The same question controls these cases as the one just decided, and, for the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, they are dismissed.[ Bachtel v. Wilson 204 U.S. 42 (1907) ]

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial