Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Johnson Vs. Keith

Johnson vs Keith

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-08-1886
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/85398

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
117 U.S. 199
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Johnson

Respondent

Keith

Excerpt

johnson v. keith - 117 u.s. 199 (1886) u.s. supreme court johnson v. keith, 117 u.s. 199 (1886) johnson v. keith submitted march 2, 1886 decided march 8, 1886 117 u.s. 199 error to the supreme court of the state of missouri syllabus a judgment of reversal in a state court, accompanied by an order remanding the cause for a retrial, is not a final judgment for the purpose of a writ of error to this court. bostwick v. brinkerhoff, 106 u. s. 4 , affirmed. this was a motion to dismiss a writ of error "because the record and mandate of the said supreme court of missouri in this cause, brought up by such writ of error, shows on the face thereof that no final judgment or decree was rendered or made in this cause by said supreme court of missouri, but on the contrary thereof, it appears from such record and mandate that the judgment and decree of the inferior court, to-wit, he said circuit court of lafayette county, missouri, was, by such supreme court of missouri, reversed, and that this cause was by such supreme court of missouri remanded to the said circuit court of lafayette county, missouri, for further proceedings to be had therein in conformity with the opinion of said supreme court of missouri in this cause delivered. such writ of error was prematurely and improvidently sued out and issued." mr. chief justice waite delivered the opinion of the court. this motion is granted. a judgment of reversal accompanied by an order remanding the cause for a retrial is not a final judgment for the purposes of a writ of error to this court. houston v. moore, 3 wheat. 433; bostwick v. brinkerhoff, 106 u. s. 4 , and cases there cited.

Full Judgment

Johnson v. Keith - 117 U.S. 199 (1886)
U.S. Supreme Court Johnson v. Keith, 117 U.S. 199 (1886)

Johnson v. Keith

Submitted March 2, 1886

Decided March 8, 1886

117 U.S. 199

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI

SYLLABUS

A judgment of reversal in a state court, accompanied by an order remanding the cause for a retrial, is not a final judgment for the purpose of a writ of error to this Court.

Bostwick v. Brinkerhoff, 106 U. S. 4 , affirmed.

This was a motion to dismiss a writ of error

"because the record and mandate of the said Supreme Court of Missouri in this cause, brought up by such writ of error, shows on the face thereof that no final judgment or decree was rendered or made in this cause by said Supreme Court of Missouri, but on the contrary thereof, it appears from such record and mandate that the judgment and decree of the inferior court, to-wit, he said Circuit Court of Lafayette County, Missouri, was, by such Supreme Court of Missouri, reversed, and that this cause was by such Supreme Court of Missouri remanded to the said Circuit Court of Lafayette County, Missouri, for further proceedings to be had therein in conformity with the opinion of said Supreme Court of Missouri in this cause delivered. Such writ of error was prematurely and improvidently sued out and issued."

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

This motion is granted. A judgment of reversal accompanied by an order remanding the cause for a retrial is not a final judgment for the purposes of a writ of error to this Court. Houston v. Moore, 3 Wheat. 433; Bostwick v. Brinkerhoff, 106 U. S. 4 , and cases there cited.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial