Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Chief Justice - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 23 1993

Hon'ble Chief Justice, High Court M.P., Jabalpur and Ors. Vs. Mohan Ku ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-23-1993

Reported in: 1993(4)SCALE656; 1994Supp(2)SCC602

We are in a state of extreme pain on receipt of a distress signal sent by the learned Chief Justice of Madhya Pradesh by his letter dated 6th August, 1993 informing this Court that the judicial work in … avoid any further complications, we are constrained to make the following order: -3. Under this circumstance the learned Chief Justice of Madhya Pradesh shall call for a full court meeting of all the Hon'ble Judges of all the


May 01 2001

Hon'ble Chief Justice, High Court of Bombay and Ors. Vs. B.S. Nayak an ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-01-2001

Reported in: [2001(90)FLR864]; JT2001(5)SC561; (2001)9SCC763

filling up the post of the Private Secretaries to the Hon'ble Judges of the High Court. The learned Chief Justice in September 1991 fixed the principle and directed that 'The criteria for promotion shall be merit-cum-seniority to be … appeal.2. The appointments to the posts of Private Secretaries in the High Courts could be made by the Chief Justice as indicated in Article 229 of the Constitution. In the absence of any rules framed by the Court


Sep 12 1978

Chief Justice of Andhra Pradesh and ors. Vs. L.V.A. Dixitulu and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-12-1978

Reported in: AIR1979SC193; 1979LabIC1672; (1979)2SCC34; [1979]1SCR26

Articles 226, 229 and 235 of the Constitution.3. In Civil Appeal 2826 of 1977, appellant 1 is the Chief Justice and appellant 2 is the High Court of Andhra Pradesh represented by the Registrar of that Court. Respondent … 6, 1956. At the time of his confirmation, he was serving on deputation, with the concurrence of the Chief Justice of the Hyderabad High Court, as Junior Law Officer in the Ministry of Law, Government of India. In


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 05 1998

Hon'ble Chief Justice Delhi High Court Vs. Gajender Pal Vohra

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-05-1998

Reported in: 76(1998)DLT548; 1998(47)DRJ583

petition filed by the respondent. 2. The writ petition was filed on 11,3.1992 seeking directions against Hon'ble the Chief Justice of Delhi High Court, the appellant herein, to declare the result of the selection test held on 16.9.1990 … is confined to direction No.2. 5. It was submitted on behalf of the appellant that the Hon'ble the Chief Justice had directed only two vacancies in selection quota in the cadre of Supereme Court Master to be tilled;


Sep 01 1970

Honb'le Chief Justice Sri B. Malik Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Sep-01-1970

Reported in: [1971]82ITR255(All)

our opinions on the particular facts of the case of the assessee, who happened to be a former Chief Justice, this court had to interpret the provisions of Section 4 of the Income-tax Act. These provisions are reproduced … the exercise of an 'occupation' he could have acquired in addition to that which he had as a Chief Justice of a High Court. We had disagreed with the view of the Tribunal that the work of an


Mar 15 1996

Ashish Handa Vs. Chief Justice of High Court of Punjab and Haryana and ... Overruled

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-15-1996

Reported in: 1996IIIAD(SC)105; AIR1996SC1308; JT1996(3)SC248; 1996(II)OLR(SC)1; 1996(2)SCALE771; (1996)3SCC145; [1996]3SCR474; 1996(1)LC844(SC)

the Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission on completion of the term of Shri S.S. Sandhewalia, a former Chief Justice of the High Court, with effect from June 30, 1994. The challenge was made on the ground that … its President :1 (Provided that no appointment under this clause shall be made except after consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court;)(b) two other members, who shall be persons of ability, integrity and standing and have


Apr 28 2004

Deepak Kumar Prahladka Vs. Chief Justice Prabha Shanker Mishra and anr ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-28-2004

Reported in: 2004(1)ALD(Cri)1017; (SCSuppl)2004(4)CHN161; 2004CriLJ2847; 2004(5)SCALE162; (2004)5SCC217

have relied. Prima facie, the Court found that the newspaper reports tend to interfere with the administration of justice. In terms of the orders dated 13th August and 16th September, 1997, suo motu contempt notice dated 26th


Feb 24 1995

M. Kamalamma and Ors. Vs. Hon'ble Chief Justice of the High Court of K ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-24-1995

Reported in: 1995(1)SCALE852; (1995)3SCC189; [1995]2SCR303; 1995(2)SLJ111(SC); 1995(1)LC827(SC)

servants of a High Court shall be such as may be prescribed by the rules made by the Chief Justice of the Court or by some other Judge or officer of the Court authorised by the Chief JusticeChief Justice of the Court or by some other Judge or officer of the Court authorised by the Chief Justice to make rules for the purpose. The staff of the High Court of Kerala made certain representations to


Jul 30 1997

Mohan Dutt Sharma Vs. Chief Justice, Punjab and Haryana High Court

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jul-30-1997

Reported in: AIR1997SC3094; JT1997(7)SC123; 1997(5)SCALE276; (1997)8SCC445; [1997]Supp3SCR162; 1997(2)LC492(SC)

funds in the subordinate courts coming to the notice of the High Court, it was decided by the Chief Justice and other Judges of the High Court that an agency should be created on the establishment of the … is to the post of Accounts Officer. On qualifying the SAS examination appellant made a representation to the Chief Justice of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in which he pointed out that he was the first official


Jul 22 1993

R.K. Mahajan Vs. Chief Justice of H.P. High Court and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jul-22-1993

Reported in: 1995Supp(3)SCC655

who was the seniormost, was being superseded and sent for his record. At that time the present Acting Chief Justice, Mr Bhiwani Singh who has replaced Ms Justice Leila Seth, at present, sent the records to the Law … no ground for his supersession, more particularly, when his name was recommended already twice by a regular appointed Chief Justice and also by two different Governments - one headed by BJP and the other by Congress. In substance,


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial