Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Pullabhotla Chinniah

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 01, 1917
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/805081

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Section 562, applicability of, to charge of house breaking - Age of accused, consideration of--Breaking open, cattle Shed--Offence--Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860), Section 457. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Pullabhotla Chinniah

Legal References

Cases Referred
Empress v. Tukaram
Reported In
39Ind.Cas.309a

Excerpt

criminal procedure code (act v of 1898), section 562, applicability of, to charge of house breaking - age of accused, consideration of--breaking open, cattle shed--offence--penal code (act xlv of 1860), section 457. - ordersadasiva aiyar, j.1. i think that there are no sufficient reasons for not accepting the facts as found by the magistrate.2. the cattle shed which was broken open was used for custody of agricultural implements and i think that the conviction under section 457 of the indian penal code was, therefore, not illegal.3. section 562 of the code of criminal procedure does not apply to a case of a person convicted of house-breaking. [the age of the accused is probably immaterial on the question whether the court is entitled to act under section 562. vide queen-empress v. tukaram 2 bom l.r. 817.4. i shall, therefore, set aside the direction for release on security passed by the magistrate under section 562 of the code of criminal procedure and i shall sentence the accused to one week's simple imprisonment.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Sadasiva Aiyar, J.

1. I think that there are no sufficient reasons for not accepting the facts as found by the Magistrate.

2. The cattle shed which was broken open was used for custody of agricultural implements and I think that the conviction under Section 457 of the Indian Penal Code was, therefore, not illegal.

3. Section 562 of the Code of Criminal Procedure does not apply to a case of a person convicted of house-breaking. [The age of the accused is probably immaterial on the question whether the Court is entitled to act under Section 562. Vide Queen-Empress v. Tukaram 2 Bom L.R. 817.

4. I shall, therefore, set aside the direction for release on security passed by the Magistrate under Section 562 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and I shall sentence the accused to one week's simple imprisonment.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial