A Person - Judgment Search Results

Bush Vs. Person

Court: US Supreme Court

How.) 82 ERROR TO THE HIGH COURT OF ERRORS AND APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI Syllabus Where a person mortgaged land which was at the time subject to a judgment lien, the deed containing what was equivalent

Estate of Late S.V. Rajammal (by Accountable Person S.V. Venkatasubbu) ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1992]197ITR55(Mad)

of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), at the instance of the accountable person and the Controller of Estate Duty, Tamil Nadu, respectively, the following questions of law have been referred to

Personal Manager, Sbi and anr. Vs. Krishna Grameena Bank Employees Uni ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008(1)KarLJ62; (2008)ILLJ894SC; 2007(3)SCALE575; 2007AIRSCW7669; 2008–I-LLJ-894; 2008LabIC474; 2007(8)Supreme675; 2008(2)KLJ62; 2008(1)AIRKarR330

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court dismissing the writ appeal filed by the appellant.2. Background facts in a nutshell are as follows:3....

The Director (Personal), Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd. Vs. R. Senat ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR2007Mad118; [2007]135CompCas329(Mad); (2007)1CompLJ272(Mad); 2007(208)ELT3(Mad); (2007)1MLJ1; [2007]75SCL20(Mad)

the plaintiff. In Ex.A.1 to A3 the name of the person is left blank. Ex.A.4 is related to a person born on 20.8.1964 to one Ramasamy Gounder and Rathinam and the copy of the same was obtained from … dealt with by the Courts, tribunal or the High Court keeping in view only the public servant concerned, a person accepts appointment keeping in view the date of retirement of his immediate senior. This is certainly an important

Tainwala Personal Care Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Royal Sundaram Alliance ...

Court: Mumbai

Oral Judgment: 1. This application arises under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. In pursuance of a proposal submitted by the Applicant for the issuance of a Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy,...

Personal Interview Total Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

has been opened. The criteria is reproduced hereunder for ready reference:- “Total Marks of the Viva-voce:100. Marks 1. Personal Achievements 40 marks a) Academic Qualifications: i) B.Tech. 10 marks FiRs.Division:10. marks Second Division:07. marks ii) Master of

Personal Interview Total Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

has been opened. The criteria is reproduced hereunder for ready reference:- “Total Marks of the Viva-voce:100. Marks 1. Personal Achievements 40 marks a) Academic Qualifications: i) B.Tech. 10 marks FiRs.Division:10. marks Second Division:07. marks ii) Master of

a Person Aggrieved by an Order of Promoting a Vs. State of Punjab and ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

or at vest within a period of one year. The observations of Hon'ble Apex Court are as under:- "A person aggrieved by an order of promoting a junior over his head should approach the Court at least within

“a Person Aggrieved by an Order of Promoting a Vs. State of Punjab a ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

versus State of Tamilnadu, AIR 197.(SC) 2271 would be relevant and the same are in the following terMs.“A person aggrieved by an order of promoting a junior over his head should approach the Court at least within

“sports Person (Punjab) Vs. State of Punjab and Others --respondents

Court: Punjab and Haryana

at Annexure P-3. Under such advertisement one post of Junior Engineer (Electrical) had been reserved for the S.C.Sports Person. To claim benefit of such reservation, it was clearly stipulated in the following terms:- “SPORTS PERSON (PUNJAB) A