Mitchell Vs. U S

Mitchell vs U S

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1834

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/79451

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/79451
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: 1834
Case Number: 33 U.S. 307
Subject: MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue: MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mitchell

Advocate Mr. White

Respondent

U S

Excerpt

mitchell v. u s - 33 u.s. 307 (1834) u.s. supreme court mitchell v. u s, 33 u.s. 307 (1834) 33 u.s. 307 (pet.) colin mitchell, appellant v. the united states. january term, 1834 on appeal from the superior court of east florida. mr chief justice marshall said: a pamphlet has been sent to the judges touching the questions in controversy in this cause. the court desire it to be understood, that the practice of the court is not to receive or examine such papers, unless they have been presented in court, and shown to the opposite counsel. it was afterwards, on the same day, stated to the court by mr white of florida, counsel for the appellant, that the counsel on neither side had any knowledge of the pamphlet's having been sent to the court; nor did they in any manner countenance the same. the pamphlet was sent to the judges by an agent of the appellant, who was not in any manner aware of the irregularity of the proceeding.

Full Judgment

MITCHELL v. U S - 33 U.S. 307 (1834)
U.S. Supreme Court MITCHELL v. U S, 33 U.S. 307 (1834)

33 U.S. 307 (Pet.)

COLIN MITCHELL, APPELLANT
v.
THE UNITED STATES.

January Term, 1834

ON appeal from the superior court of East Florida.

Mr Chief Justice MARSHALL said:

A pamphlet has been sent to the judges touching the questions in controversy in this cause. The court desire it to be understood, that the practice of the court is not to receive or examine such papers, unless they have been presented in court, and shown to the opposite counsel.

It was afterwards, on the same day, stated to the court by Mr White of Florida, counsel for the appellant, that the counsel on neither side had any knowledge of the pamphlet's having been sent to the court; nor did they in any manner countenance the same. The pamphlet was sent to the judges by an agent of the appellant, who was not in any manner aware of the irregularity of the proceeding.

Same Parties Mitchell vs U S Same Subject MRTP