Advanced Search Results
Mitchell Vs. U S
US Supreme Court
Jan-01-1834
MRTP
Mr. White
MITCHELL v. U S - 33 U.S. 307 (1834) U.S. Supreme Court MITCHELL v. U S, 33 U.S. 307 (1834) 33 U.S. 307 (Pet.) COLIN MITCHELL, APPELLANT v. THE UNITED STATES. January Term, 1834 ON appeal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Surety Co. Vs. Coriell
US Supreme Court
May-22-1933
Land Acquisition
National Surety Co. v. Coriell - 289 U.S. 426 (1933) U.S. Supreme Court National Surety Co. v. Coriell, 289 U.S. 426 (1933) National Surety Co. v. Coriell No. 8 Argued December 15, 1932 Decided May 22,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPatrick Vs. Graham
US Supreme Court
Jan-06-1990
Land Acquisition
Patrick v. Graham - 132 U.S. 627 (1990) U.S. Supreme Court Patrick v. Graham, 132 U.S. 627 (1890) Patrick v. Graham No. 152 Argued December 10, 1889 Decided January 6, 1990 132 U.S. 627 ERROR TO...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Barendra Prosad Roy and ors. Vs. Income-tax Officer, a Ward, Foreign S ...
Kolkata
Feb-19-1973
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 160 and 163(1)
77CWN396,[1973]91ITR82(Cal)
P.P. Ginwalla, ;D. Pal and ;A. Chaudhuri, Advs.
Amiya Kumar Mookerji, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of Sabyasachi Mukharji J. discharging a rule nisi obtained by the appellants in an application under Article 226 of the Constitution on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHenkel India Ltd. Vs. Mr. Chandan Chhabra and anr.
Delhi
Jan-03-2013
Intellectual Property
#F-11 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1220/2009 HENKEL INDIA LTD. Through ..... Plaintiff Mr. N. Mahabir with Dr. Sheetal Vohra, Advocates versus MR. CHANDAN CHHABRA AND ANR. ........
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAndersen Vs. Treat
US Supreme Court
Nov-14-1898
Education
Andersen v. Treat - 172 U.S. 24 (1898) U.S. Supreme Court Andersen v. Treat, 172 U.S. 24 (1898) Andersen v. Treat No. 416 Argued November 8, 1898 Decided November 14, 1898 172 U.S. 24 APPEAL FROM...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCol. D.i. Mac Pherson Vs. M.N. Appanna and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-09-1951
Commercial
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 109
AIR1951SC184; [1951]2SCR161
Mr. Jindra Lal
Fazl Ali, J. 1. This is an appeal from a judgment of the Judicial Commissioner of Coorg in a suit filed by the first respondent (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff) against the appellant (hereinafter referred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeepak Kumar and Dinesh Kumar Vs. Union of India Etc.
Delhi
Nov-28-1983
Criminal
Constitution of India - Article 22(5); Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3(1); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108
25(1984)DLT77
Kapil Sibal,; U.K. Sharma,; Urmila Khanna and;
Charanjit Talwar, J. (1) This judgment disposes of two petitions, viz., Criminal Writ No. 84 of 1983 and Criminal Writ No 77 of 1983 filed by Deepak Kumar and Dinesh Kumar respectively for issuance of a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWhite Vs. Nicholls
US Supreme Court
Jan-01-1845
Miscellaneous
White v. Nicholls - 44 U.S. 266 (1845) U.S. Supreme Court White v. Nicholls, 44 U.S. 3 How. 266 266 (1845) White v. Nicholls 44 U.S. (3 How.) 266 ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPacific Health Care Pvt. Ltd. and Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Sales Tax Tribunal STT West Bengal
May-12-2000
MRTP
(2001)123STC305Tribunal
1. These six applications under Section 8 of the West Bengal Taxation Tribunal Act, 1987 are in the nature of writ applications under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The cases were heard analogously, because...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »