United States Vs. Mcdaniel

United States vs Mcdaniel

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1832

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/79369

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/79369
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: 1832
Case Number: 31 U.S. 634
Subject: Arbitration

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Arbitration

Key legal issue: Arbitration

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

United States

Respondent

Mcdaniel

Excerpt

.....made by mr. coxe, for the defendant, to dismiss this suit for want of jurisdiction, the sum in controversy at the trial being less than $1,000 and it appearing from the bill of exceptions that the only items in controversy on which the instruction excepted to was given by the circuit court were less than that sum. mr. chief justice marshall delivered the opinion of the court overruling the motion. the declaration is for a balance of accounts of $988.94, and the ad damnum is laid at $2,000. the bill of exceptions shows that the united states claimed interest on the balance due to them. there is general verdict for the defendant. under these circumstances, it is no objection to the jurisdiction that the bill of exceptions was taken by the counsel for the united states to a refusal of the circuit court to grant an instruction asked by the united states, which was applicable to certain items of credit only, claimed by the defendant, which would reduce the debt below the sum of $1,000. the court cannot judicially know that influence that refusal had upon the verdict. the motion was overruled.

Full Judgment

United States v. McDaniel - 31 U.S. 634 (1832)
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. McDaniel, 31 U.S. 6 Pet. 634 634 (1832)

United States v. McDaniel

31 U.S. (6 Pet.) 634

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR

THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SYLLABUS

The declaration was for a balance of accounts of $988.94, and the ad damnum was laid at $2,000. The bill of exceptions showed that the United States claimed interest on the balances due it. Under those circumstances, it is no objection to the jurisdiction that the bill of exceptions was taken by the counsel for the United States to a refusal of the court to grant an instruction asked by the United States which was applicable to certain items of credit only claimed by the defendants which would reduce the debt below the sum of $1,000. The Court cannot judicially know what influence that refusal had upon the, verdict.

A motion was made by Mr. Coxe, for the defendant, to dismiss this suit for want of jurisdiction, the sum in controversy at the trial being less than $1,000 and it appearing from the bill of exceptions that the only items in controversy on which the instruction excepted to was given by the circuit court were less than that sum.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court overruling the motion.

The declaration is for a balance of accounts of $988.94, and the ad damnum is laid at $2,000. The bill of exceptions shows that the United States claimed interest on the balance due to them. There is general verdict for the defendant. Under these circumstances, it is no objection to the jurisdiction that the bill of exceptions was taken by the counsel for the United States to a refusal of the circuit court to grant an instruction asked by the United States, which was applicable to certain items of credit only, claimed by the defendant, which would reduce the debt below the sum of $1,000. The court cannot judicially know that influence that refusal had upon the verdict.

The motion was overruled.

Same Parties United States vs Mcdaniel Same Subject Arbitration