Advanced Search Results

Tpr Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by Its Director, Mr. Naveen Chandra Pulij ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act - Sections 2(1), 11(5), 11(6) and 11(12); Contract Act - Sections 28; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : 2009(4)ALT16

That in case of disputes at any level, it shall be solved within the jurisdiction of Mumbai by arbitration only.Since the contract has not been renewed, it had expired by 4th August, 2005. Certain disputes have cropped

M/S Dharam Pal Chiman Lal vs M/S Shree Shakumbhari Glass and Glazers

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Adv. (through VC)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 05.05.20261. The present petition is filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short „the Act‟) for appointment of an arbitrator.2. The brief facts are that

Executive Engineer, Dhenkanal Minor Irrigation Division, Orissa, Etc. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 34; Interest Act, 1978; Interest Act, 1839; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 61(2) and 80; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 3, 29 and 41; Sections 19A; Civil Procedure Act, 1933 - Sections 28, 29, 35A and 97A; Contract Act, 1956 - Sections 73; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 80; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 61(2)

Reported in : AIR2001SC626; 2001(2)ALLMR(SC)260; (2001)3CALLT1(SC); 91(2001)CLT754(SC); JT2001(1)SC486; (2001)2MLJ128(SC); 2001(1)MPHT526; 2001(1)SCALE109; [2001]1SCR264; (2001) 2 SCC 721

to award interest from the date the amount is due under the contract, on the ground that the arbitration agreement did not exclude the jurisdiction of the arbitrator but the earlier decision of the Court either in

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Chhajjoomal and Sons and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : ArbitrationLimitation

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8, 20, 29, 30, 33 and 39

Reported in : 2002(5)MPHT354

are deciding these Misc. Appeals which have been preferred by both the parties under Section 39(vi) of the Arbitration Act, 1940 being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 29th March, 1985 passed by Additional District Judge,

State of Gujarat and Another Vs. B M Patel and Bros and Another

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Arbitration

rate revision. Since the parties could not come to any settlement about such rate revision, in terms of arbitration clause contained in the contract, they resorted to the process of arbitration. 2.2 The Government therefore, issued a

Secretary, Irrigation Department, Government of Orissa and Others Vs. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2, 3, 17, 30, 41, 47; Arbitration Act, 1934 - Sections 11; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 5(3), 23 and 34; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 61; Interest Act, 1839; Punjab Requisition and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1948

Reported in : AIR1992SC732; 1992(1)ARBLR145(SC); JT1991(6)SC349; 1992(I)OLR(SC)215; 1991(2)SCALE1369; (1992)1SCC508; [1991]3SCR417; [1991]Supp3SCR417; 1992(1)LC276(SC); MANU/SC/0142/1992

set aside merely on the ground of absence of reasons. The Constitution Bench further held that where the arbitration agreement itself stipulated reasons for the award the Arbitrator is under a legal obligation to give reasons. Thus

M/S Young Achievers Vs. Ims Learning Resources Pvt.Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

the appellant herein. Appellant preferred IA No.18 of 2012 under Section 8, read with Section 5 -of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for rejecting the plaint and referring the dispute to arbitration and also for other

Jsw Ispat Steel Limited Vs. Jeumont Electric and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

The plaintiff has filed the present suit for a declaration that there is no arbitration agreement between the plaintiff and defendant No.1 including in relation to contract No.4600006177 dated 7th September 2006 as

Jsw Ispat Steel Limited Vs. Jeumont Electric and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

The plaintiff has filed the present suit for a declaration that there is no arbitration agreement between the plaintiff and defendant No.1 including in relation to contract No.4600006177 dated 7th September 2006 as

Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. Cherian Varkey Construction Co.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 7, 8, 9, 82 and 84; Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 - Sections 19, 20(1) and 22(C); Indian Telegraph Act - Sections 7B; Arbitration Act, 1940; Common Law Procedure Act, 1854 - Sections 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11, 89, 89(1), 89(2) and 115 - Order 10, Rules 1A, 1B and 1C; Kerala Co-operative Societies Act - Sections 69; Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 141

Reported in : 2007(1)ARBLR405(Kerala); 2007(1)KLT196

into the Code of Civil Procedure permit, tolerate or enable the court to compulsorily refer the parties to arbitration even without their consent and against their volition? This is the question that is mooted for consideration in